Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

captain queeg

(11,780 posts)

7. A "secret" clearance is no big deal.

Reply to jgo (Original post)

Thu Jun 15, 2023, 04:59 PM

Jun 2023

I had one when I working. I read there are about 2 million holders of that level of security clearance. We all knows TFG didn’t give a flying f*** about clearances.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Cannon jumpstarts oversight of Trump classified documents case with order on security clearanc [View all] jgo Jun 2023 OP

Maybe being publicly raked over the coals made an Phoenix61 Jun 2023 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Jun 2023 #19

Judges are exempt from public ridicule? nt Phoenix61 Jun 2023 #27

Does she dweller Jun 2023 #2

This! TexLaProgressive Jun 2023 #4

Doubt it. 2naSalit Jun 2023 #5

Seems like a dumb question johnnyfins Jun 2023 #10

Ha.. great question! mountain grammy Jun 2023 #16

I dont think federal Judges need one.... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #17

Everyone who views restricted material MUST perforce have clearance. It maybe part of vetting for Ford_Prefect Jun 2023 #21

Not judges, it's about separation of powers. Citation below carpetbagger Jun 2023 #24

That is quite concerning in this case particularly. She was shoved onto the court with little Ford_Prefect Jun 2023 #31

That's what I was wondering! AllyCat Jun 2023 #33

It's not as bad... carpetbagger Jun 2023 #37

Untrue FBaggins Jun 2023 #26

I mean, like this dweller Jun 2023 #22

The routine grinding, meticulous plodding of the rule of law...isn't it magnificent? Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #3

Elizabeth Holmes was charged by federal prosecutors in 2018, finally convicted in 2022 just now jail Shanti Shanti Shanti Jun 2023 #23

That's how presumption of innocence, right to appeal, proof beyond Twitter doubt, works! Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #32

Great post onenote Jun 2023 #34

👍 bad enough the corporations keep dragging out their staff lawyers to comment on complex Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #36

In a case of this nature, this is a proper course of action jmowreader Jun 2023 #6

A "secret" clearance is no big deal. captain queeg Jun 2023 #7

Pretty much the reason he's in his current predicament SouthernDem4ever Jun 2023 #8

I think I remember that Jarad at least was turned down for a clearance captain queeg Jun 2023 #12

Both he and the Princess didn't qualify. WinstonSmith4740 Jun 2023 #18

I predict that Todd Blanche, facing a malpractice suit, won't be given classification clearance. ancianita Jun 2023 #9

Heh. Just deserts. dchill Jun 2023 #13

An unproven set of allegations in a malpractice suit onenote Jun 2023 #35

As Andrew Weissmann said, this is kinda good news/bad news. rsdsharp Jun 2023 #11

Yep. Moreover, bad news is she's allowing clearance to anyone called "forthcoming," ancianita Jun 2023 #14

There Is No Way That Trump Doesn't Appeal This Ruling DallasNE Jun 2023 #15

There is no way he does. onenote Jun 2023 #20

Why would he? It's a built in delay tactic for him. wnylib Jun 2023 #29

There's no reason for him to appeal, but it also isn't a delaying tactic FBaggins Jun 2023 #30

28 months and counting republianmushroom Jun 2023 #25

K & R Duppers Jun 2023 #28