Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

OnDoutside

(20,866 posts)

5. Hard to argue with that.

Reply to DURHAM D (Reply #3)

Sat Feb 10, 2024, 03:42 PM

Feb 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

White House frustration with Garland grows [View all] Polybius Feb 2024 OP

I'm thinking Garland will be retiring, Bayard Feb 2024 #1

The sooner the better. comradebillyboy Feb 2024 #2

Amen. And if the election falls right for Biden, there's OnDoutside Feb 2024 #4

yes please nt et tu Feb 2024 #12

2 words: Sally Yates onetexan Feb 2024 #20

Don't really want to throw her to wolves. Silent Type Feb 2024 #29

How about a promotion for Jack Smith Mr.Bee Feb 2024 #14

Post removed Post removed Feb 2024 #15

There is no "DU nannybot." None. There are only DU members and 2 owners/Admins... Hekate Feb 2024 #19

The quotable quote from the article - DURHAM D Feb 2024 #3

Hard to argue with that. OnDoutside Feb 2024 #5

Why we've had nothing but repuke independent counsels The Unmitigated Gall Feb 2024 #7

Exactly. It's time for Democrats to go scorched earth total war and no holds barred! OrlandoDem2 Feb 2024 #9

Absolutely. hadEnuf Feb 2024 #10

Amen to that. Don't always bring a knife.. N/T AloeVera Feb 2024 #31

Was Biden Rebl2 Feb 2024 #13

I've always said Garland is the wrong man for the job. Novara Feb 2024 #6

Thank the gods the republicans held up his nomination to the Supreme Court! Barry Markson Feb 2024 #8

I doubt he'd be worse than Neil Gorsuch. ShazzieB Feb 2024 #24

Too late to Mme. Defarge Feb 2024 #11

What? Does this mean it is now allowed on DU to criticize Garland without alerts and vitriolic replies? PSPS Feb 2024 #16

Doh! Ponietz Feb 2024 #17

Curious, isn't it? hueymahl Feb 2024 #22

I wish they did not. Yes, we Democrats bend backwards but we should be proud that we question everything Feb 2024 #18

In his attempt to appear fair, he picked a GOP tool Novara Feb 2024 #23

Correct... agingdem Feb 2024 #28

As it should. KPN Feb 2024 #21

It makes me wonder what kind of Supreme Court Justice Garland would have been... Martin68 Feb 2024 #25

Well, better than Gorsuch Polybius Feb 2024 #26

Always been weak sauce LiberalLovinLug Feb 2024 #27

Soon, we need to quit bashing Garland and Hur (though deserved) and start concentrating on winning 2024. Silent Type Feb 2024 #30

Garland is too conservative, still thinks that he should be a member of the US Supreme Court or that he's SWBTATTReg Feb 2024 #32

Right wing want this. So I must ask PlutosHeart Feb 2024 #33

I'm guessing PJB "supported the decision" Not having a clue at the Cha Feb 2024 #34