Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
"One of the most concerning incidents in this case, in a long line of concerning incidents, is when D.A. Willis used her position to threaten Mr. Wade's wife, Joycelyn Wade, during their divorce proceedings," Kramer wrote. "D.A. Willis stated in a motion that Ms. Wade was trying to embarrass and harass her, and by extension, interfere and obstruct in the conduct of the [D.A.] election."
Ms. Willis stated that Mrs. Wade tried to embarass and harrass her creating interference during the DA election. That is not a threat. It's a statement. Big difference from what Kramer is claiming without any proof whatsoever. I mean, if Mrs. Wade felt so threatened, why didn't she try to sue Willis? Why does this man think he has a dog in this fight?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read