Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(170,368 posts)
Fri Jul 5, 2024, 05:36 PM Jul 2024

Trump seeks pause on classified documents case after Supreme Court immunity ruling [View all]

Source: Reuters

July 5, 2024 4:05 PM EDT Updated an hour ago


WASHINGTON, July 5 (Reuters) - Lawyers for Donald Trump asked a U.S. judge on Friday to partially pause the criminal case accusing the former president of mishandling classified documents, after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that presidents have broad immunity for official acts.

Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, said the Supreme Court's ruling that he has broad immunity from criminal prosecution in a case over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election also boosts his claim of immunity in the classified documents prosecution. A pause is necessary "to minimize the adverse consequences to the institution of the presidency arising from this unconstitutional investigation and prosecution," Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing.

The request is the latest effort by Trump's legal team to capitalize on the Supreme Court ruling as he faces four criminal prosecutions. Trump has already used the decision to delay his sentencing on charges he falsified business records. It is also another attempt at delaying the proceedings as Trump seeks to unseat Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 election.

Trump's legal team asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump nominee who is overseeing the documents case, to halt activity until she rules on Trump's requests to throw out the charges based on his claim of immunity and his argument that lead prosecutor Jack Smith was unlawfully appointed. spokesperson for Smith declined to comment.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-seeks-pause-classified-documents-case-after-supreme-court-immunity-ruling-2024-07-05/

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He'll get it, too, probably with two scoops of ice cream. Ocelot II Jul 2024 #1
Stealing the classified documents was an unofficial act. What POTUS put national security at risk as part of their iluvtennis Jul 2024 #2
He wasn't president when he took the documents...at least the ones he took exiting the WH PortTack Jul 2024 #3
And he sure was not when he told his lawyer to lie to the FBI and... Justice matters. Jul 2024 #9
That's exactly what I just said to my hubs! He was no longer president slightlv Jul 2024 #10
NOPE. He was no longer President when he took those documents. CousinIT Jul 2024 #4
I can't imagine enduring another 3 1/2 years of TFG holding rallies, refusing to admit he lost - again! Rhiannon12866 Jul 2024 #11
I can. I look forward to it. JustABozoOnThisBus Jul 2024 #13
He says he made them "personal records" while he was still Pres. oldsoftie Jul 2024 #14
Some things he can, others he can't jmowreader Jul 2024 #21
See, I wondered about the nuke papers. Seemed like there HAD to be more controls there. oldsoftie Jul 2024 #23
This is an interesting article that you might like jmowreader Jul 2024 #27
VERY good read. Explains it very well. Thanks very much oldsoftie Jul 2024 #28
It never was and never will be an official act to commit treason Marthe48 Jul 2024 #5
I don't get it either. Why is everyone doing nothing BlueKota Jul 2024 #7
I am sure Aileen will bend over backwards BlueKota Jul 2024 #6
Or forwards. oldsoftie Jul 2024 #15
The delays have succussed. republianmushroom Jul 2024 #8
Immunity is not for life and his actions with the documents after he was out of office are the issue. cstanleytech Jul 2024 #12
Again, no trial before the election. Never was going to happen. oldsoftie Jul 2024 #16
There will be "evidentiary" hearings by Judge Chutkan BEFORE the election BumRushDaShow Jul 2024 #17
So we're told. That could change & wouldn't surprise me. oldsoftie Jul 2024 #18
However from what I understand BumRushDaShow Jul 2024 #19
I do get your point, but look at the polls oldsoftie Jul 2024 #20
"but look at the polls" BumRushDaShow Jul 2024 #24
Wow, I certainly wasnt aware of the Kansas poll!! Thats a HORRIBLE fail oldsoftie Jul 2024 #25
The problem is them determining who would be "likely voters" BumRushDaShow Jul 2024 #26
I like innocent presidents RANDYWILDMAN Jul 2024 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump seeks pause on clas...