Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
6. Okay but the story is about a fight over moving the barrier closer.
Tue Jul 16, 2024, 07:46 AM
Jul 2024

Protesters lost that fight:

The Coalition to March on the RNC fought hard over the final route of the march, to ensure their chants would at least have a chance of being heard by RNC attendees, and sued the City of Milwaukee and the U.S. Secret Service over the security zone that would have pushed the protest too far away to be heard by RNC attendees.

Protest organizers lost that lawsuit, but reached a “handshake agreement” with the city to allow the march closer to the convention’s Fiserv Forum. But after all that, demonstrators say Republican delegates aren’t really the audience they need to reach.

It comes at the end of the article which is organized in reverse chronology so the first part wind up last. But the title is accurate.

[
Protesters with March on the RNC gather for a demonstration during the first day of the 2024 Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, July 15, 2024.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Trump is what we get for our lack of participation". What she said is profound. SupportSanity Jul 2024 #1
Thank you! ucrdem Jul 2024 #15
Classic... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #2
I don't think so. ucrdem Jul 2024 #3
Republicans are fragile. They burn in the light Traurigkeit Jul 2024 #4
yes, the protests are allowed up to the barrier... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #5
Okay but the story is about a fight over moving the barrier closer. ucrdem Jul 2024 #6
Maybe the headline, which is what my post is about Think. Again. Jul 2024 #7
It is a synopsis. And "security barrier" is a term used to describe security barriers, not SS protection. ucrdem Jul 2024 #8
wow, you really want the fear of these protests... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #9
Read the article. n/t ucrdem Jul 2024 #10
My post was about the headline, as I've now mentioned 3 times. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #11
Fine, now read the article already. n/t ucrdem Jul 2024 #12
nah, not really interested. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #13
Yes I gathered as much. ucrdem Jul 2024 #14
Yep, my only concern, as my post clearly stated... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #16
Obvious to you and only you. Nothing to do with reality. ucrdem Jul 2024 #17
Thank you, I will continue to be me. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #18
Well, the number of posts supporting your creative interpretation is exactly zero. ucrdem Jul 2024 #19
I actually have one rec more than your zero in this subthread... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #20
Congrats, but I said posts, not recs. ucrdem Jul 2024 #21
listen, if you really need to be in denial about how much... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #22
That's another issue isn't it? ucrdem Jul 2024 #23
Nope, it is the specific issue I addressed in my post. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Progressives try to send ...»Reply #6