Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'Blank this blank' puts woman in jail [View all]RKP5637
(67,112 posts)6. And not to be outdone! ""Arizona to make it illegal to use “offensive” language online?""
The state legislature of Arizona has passed a bill that vastly broadens telephone harassment laws and applies them to the Internet and other means of electronic communication...
H.B. 2549 would make it a crime to use any electronic or digital device to communicate using obscene, lewd or profane language or to suggest a lewd or lascivious act if done with intent to annoy, offend, harass or terrify, the letter notes. Lewd and profane are not defined in the statute or by reference. Lewd is generally understood to mean lusty or sexual in nature and profane is generally defined as disrespectful or irreverent about religion or religious practices.
H.B. 2549 is not limited to a one to one conversation between two specific people. The communication does not need to be repetitive or even unwanted. There is no requirement that the recipient or subject of the speech actually feel offended, annoyed or scared. Nor does the legislation make clear that the communication must be intended to offend or annoy the reader, the subject or even any specific person.
H.B. 2549 would make it a crime to use any electronic or digital device to communicate using obscene, lewd or profane language or to suggest a lewd or lascivious act if done with intent to annoy, offend, harass or terrify, the letter notes. Lewd and profane are not defined in the statute or by reference. Lewd is generally understood to mean lusty or sexual in nature and profane is generally defined as disrespectful or irreverent about religion or religious practices.
H.B. 2549 is not limited to a one to one conversation between two specific people. The communication does not need to be repetitive or even unwanted. There is no requirement that the recipient or subject of the speech actually feel offended, annoyed or scared. Nor does the legislation make clear that the communication must be intended to offend or annoy the reader, the subject or even any specific person.
https://whyweprotest.net/community/threads/arizona-passes-bill-banning-profanity-online-lolwut.101473/
http://www.setyoufreenews.com/2012/04/02/arizona-passes-sweeping-internet-censorship-bill/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Amazing, isn't it. I still think many Americans still just don't get how outrageous
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#92
And not to be outdone! ""Arizona to make it illegal to use “offensive” language online?""
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#6
Definitely a state on my list to avoid. Not for vacation, not for anything except as a
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#10
That'll get you 10 years in a corporate prison, but think of the jobs created. Hell, this
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#23
Huh. Might have to find me a linux box and write a script, send them "Fuck H.B. 2549" a few
jtuck004
Dec 2012
#58
“Take away the right to say 'fuck' and you take away the right to say 'fuck the government'.”
Journeyman
Dec 2012
#12
That won't eliminate oppression. Instead, there will be no buffer to mitigate or fight the groups...
freshwest
Dec 2012
#91
I didn't even have to look at the pic to know. power run amok, apparently--and from what I read
niyad
Dec 2012
#13
Niyad, prepare to be shocked (sarcasm) but this judge was appointed by a republican governor who
okaawhatever
Dec 2012
#53
belligerently using profanities and causing a scene could be a minor breach of the peace
arely staircase
Dec 2012
#41
Jeez ... don't give them any ideas. What a F'ed up state to live in ... anymore, one has to be
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#32
I was talking to someone recently that had moved out of Michigan. Young, bright and
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#67
Ain't America just the greatest!!! Yep, free speech, well, I guess that's only for the repressive
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#29
I'm wondering if the ACLU took this case because of the denial of bail to a homeless person. Or one
okaawhatever
Dec 2012
#33
I think that might have been where this guy had lived that I mentioned in #67. I took
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#70
Fuck that shit. I hope she sues and recovers a nice chunk of change from the clerk's office. nt
SunSeeker
Dec 2012
#51
Fuck that shit, indeed! I encourage everyone to read the full article on this.
Poll_Blind
Dec 2012
#74