Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Aussie105

(7,610 posts)

7. So the 'too much skin' filters aren't working?

Reply to BoycottTwitter (Original post)

Fri Jan 2, 2026, 06:47 PM

Friday

They have been around for a long time.

Grok looks inwards and finds itself sadly lacking.
Pull the plug, someone!

Using AI for pervy image generation was always going to happen.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Grok says safeguard lapses led to images of 'minors in minimal clothing' on X [View all] BoycottTwitter Friday OP

So now Grok just gets quoted on a story about Grok as if Grok was real or something? Ol Janx Spirit Friday #1

I agree, I didn't like that part of the article BoycottTwitter Friday #3

Thanks for the link! And yes, I was not at all criticizing the post at all--just really... Ol Janx Spirit Friday #4

If anyone thinks they are telling the truth about scope or degree in that statement RockRaven Friday #2

No shit! 2naSalit Friday #5

ai keeps going perv/hater. pansypoo53219 Friday #6

So the 'too much skin' filters aren't working? Aussie105 Friday #7

why, were the kids supposed to be completely naked according to Muskrat? Wonder Why Friday #8