Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Heritage paper on families calls for 'marriage bootcamp,' more babies [View all]eppur_se_muova
(41,003 posts)31. The Soviet Union, especially under Stalin, did the same thing.
Family Code of 1936
Unlike earlier codes that arranged for temporary and transitive laws as a step toward the revolutionary vision of family; the Code of 1936 marked an ideological shift away from Marxist / revolutionary visions of the nuclear family.[12] Coinciding with the rise of Stalinism, the law demanded the stabilizing and strengthening of the family. "The "withering-away" doctrine, once central to socialist understand of the family, law, and the state, was anathematized."[5]
The 1936 code emerged along with an eruption of pro-family propaganda.[12] For the first time, the code put restrictions on abortion and imposed fines and jail time for any that received or performed the service. The code also enacted a bevy of laws aimed to encourage pregnancy and child birth. Insurance stipends, pregnancy leave, job security, light duty, child care services and payments for large families. In another drastic move, the code made it more difficult to obtain a divorce. Under the code, both parties would need to be present for a divorce and pay a fine. There could be harsh penalties for those who failed to pay alimony and child-support payments.[5]
"Our demands grow day to day. We need fighters, they build this life. We need people."[5] The wider campaign to encourage the family unit elevated motherhood to a form of Stakhanovite labor. During this time, motherhood was celebrated as patriotic and the joys of children and family were extolled by the country's leaders.
Family Edict of 1944
The Family Edict of 1944 would be a continuation of the conservative trending of the 1936 code. Citing the heavy manpower losses and social disruption following World War II, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet enacted laws that would further encourage marriage and childbirth.
The 1944 Edict offered greater state-sponsored benefits to mothers, including: Extended maternity leave, increased family allowances even to unmarried mothers, promises of burgeoning child care services, targeted labor protections, and most notably, state recognition and the honorary title "Mother Heroine" for mothers who could produce large families.[13]
The edict also sought to preserve the family unit by making divorces even more difficult to obtain. Fines were increased and the parties were often ordered to attempt reconciliation. Divorce also became a public matter. Divorcees were required to appear in public court and their intent was published in the local newspaper.[14]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_in_the_Soviet_Union#Family_Code_of_1936
Unlike earlier codes that arranged for temporary and transitive laws as a step toward the revolutionary vision of family; the Code of 1936 marked an ideological shift away from Marxist / revolutionary visions of the nuclear family.[12] Coinciding with the rise of Stalinism, the law demanded the stabilizing and strengthening of the family. "The "withering-away" doctrine, once central to socialist understand of the family, law, and the state, was anathematized."[5]
The 1936 code emerged along with an eruption of pro-family propaganda.[12] For the first time, the code put restrictions on abortion and imposed fines and jail time for any that received or performed the service. The code also enacted a bevy of laws aimed to encourage pregnancy and child birth. Insurance stipends, pregnancy leave, job security, light duty, child care services and payments for large families. In another drastic move, the code made it more difficult to obtain a divorce. Under the code, both parties would need to be present for a divorce and pay a fine. There could be harsh penalties for those who failed to pay alimony and child-support payments.[5]
"Our demands grow day to day. We need fighters, they build this life. We need people."[5] The wider campaign to encourage the family unit elevated motherhood to a form of Stakhanovite labor. During this time, motherhood was celebrated as patriotic and the joys of children and family were extolled by the country's leaders.
Family Edict of 1944
The Family Edict of 1944 would be a continuation of the conservative trending of the 1936 code. Citing the heavy manpower losses and social disruption following World War II, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet enacted laws that would further encourage marriage and childbirth.
The 1944 Edict offered greater state-sponsored benefits to mothers, including: Extended maternity leave, increased family allowances even to unmarried mothers, promises of burgeoning child care services, targeted labor protections, and most notably, state recognition and the honorary title "Mother Heroine" for mothers who could produce large families.[13]
The edict also sought to preserve the family unit by making divorces even more difficult to obtain. Fines were increased and the parties were often ordered to attempt reconciliation. Divorce also became a public matter. Divorcees were required to appear in public court and their intent was published in the local newspaper.[14]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_in_the_Soviet_Union#Family_Code_of_1936
"Large" families meant at least 10 children.
I hope this was referenced in footnotes in the "Project 2025" paper. Credit should go where credit is due, and Stalin's contribution was substantial.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Heritage paper on families calls for 'marriage bootcamp,' more babies [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Yesterday
OP
Just what sane people don't need or want - Think Tanks in their bedrooms
bucolic_frolic
Yesterday
#1
How About A "Mind Your Own Fucking Business" Bootcamp for the Heritage Foundation . . .
hatrack
Yesterday
#2
"Heritage paper on families calls for 'marriage bootcamp,' more white babies"
Ray Bruns
Yesterday
#6
I got my vasectomy at Planned Parenthood for only $400. saved me millions.
multigraincracker
Yesterday
#8
No, they will just make it illegal for women with young children to work outside the home
DBoon
Yesterday
#28
How about encouraging more births by giving young couples hope that their children will not inherit a destroyed country
LaMouffette
Yesterday
#15
I decided I didn't want kids, then later in life I regretted it (just a little bit), but NOW I'm glad I never brought
LaMouffette
9 hrs ago
#44
Fewer and fewer women are bothering to marry and have kids. They LIKE being alone and having their own
valleyrogue
Yesterday
#38
Yup! I can't blame them. Patriarchy is an evil force. This is why the white Christian nationalist racists are so worried
LaMouffette
9 hrs ago
#43
They seem to forget we are Americans and all during our lives we have been told
samnsara
Yesterday
#16
The Heritage foundation was always an anti-communist right wing propaganda outlet. the irony here is that they are
Martin68
Yesterday
#19
Some say no to kids because of 1) life and health of mother is being disregarded, 2) economy and 3) fascism
lostnfound
Yesterday
#20
They're forgetting one important point. No sane woman wants to hop in the sack with a Republican.
Vinca
Yesterday
#30
Sadly, there's no big shortage of insane women -- just look at Trmp's cabinet.
eppur_se_muova
Yesterday
#33