Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(172,433 posts)
Fri May 22, 2026, 08:27 AM Yesterday

Bipartisan House bill would ban use of federal money for DOJ's "anti-weaponization" fund [View all]

Source: CBS News

Updated on: May 21, 2026 / 8:28 PM EDT


Washington — Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi of New York introduced a bill Thursday to ban the use of federal money for paying out claims from the Justice Department's new "anti-weaponization" fund.

The bill, titled the Bipartisan Transparency for American Taxpayers Act, comes as Republicans fight over the nearly $1.8 billion fund that was established to compensate people who claim they were improperly targeted or investigated by the government. Allies and supporters of the president, including some of those involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, have said they plan to submit claims for payouts.

The fund was created as part of a settlement of a suit by President Trump against the IRS over a leak of his tax returns, a highly unusual arrangement that has elicited strong criticism from Democrats and a growing number of Republicans on Capitol Hill.

Fitzpatrick and Suozzi's two-page bill says "no federal funds … may be used for the payment of any claim submitted to the Anti-Weaponization Fund, established by the Department of Justice on May 18, 2026." "Congress has a constitutional responsibility to protect taxpayer dollars and oversee federal spending," Fitzpatrick said in a statement. "Taxpayer dollars will not become a discretionary payout fund. Transparency is not optional. Accountability is not negotiable."

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-fund-house-bill-fitzpatrick-suozzi/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Weak, sequestered sauce bucolic_frolic Yesterday #1
Just more Icanthinkformyself Yesterday #2
Who will vote on this bill? They've all left town for at least 2+ weeks FakeNoose Yesterday #3
It's not a settlement. Griefbird 22 hrs ago #4
Am I wrong ... oldsoldierfadingfast 21 hrs ago #5
This is a different bill BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago #6
Got it together now - Thanks n/t oldsoldierfadingfast 16 hrs ago #7
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bipartisan House bill wou...