Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

littlemissmartypants

(34,651 posts)

13. Why don't we just get chips implanted in our foreheads?

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Fri May 29, 2026, 08:13 PM

22 hrs ago

Or QR Code tattoos?

Then, we can be scanned every time we vote.

The federal government doesn't run elections. As much as the regime's lackeys would like them to.

FDT

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Postal Service proposes requiring states to provide mail-in ballot voter lists [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Yesterday OP

STFU and deliver the mail Steiner. You don't get to make rules or law. pecosbob Yesterday #1

So, a back-door way for IQ47 to get voter information from the states who've told him to get bent AZJonnie Yesterday #2

Easier to break vote secrecy. They can open "to verify" and know who you voted for. SharonAnn 10 hrs ago #21

The tools the regime are trying to build will tell them who everyone is likely to vote for AZJonnie 5 hrs ago #22

UGH................... Lovie777 Yesterday #3

The illegal executive order that mandates coordination with SSA is a... pat_k Yesterday #4

He may be both, but his excuse was.... reACTIONary 20 hrs ago #17

Illegal. Period. live love laugh Yesterday #5

No. There is only one reason why this regime wants to do this shit when no one else has tried or even cared to. Karasu Yesterday #6

They know how many are mailed idahoblue Yesterday #7

That would the ENTIRE GOLDEN STATE OF CALIFORNIA usonian Yesterday #8

just everyone over 18 and a citizen Retrograde 21 hrs ago #14

Doesn't this run contrary to its consitutional definition of a postal service, namely providing roads to in2herbs Yesterday #9

Partisan Postal Service? 2na fisherman Yesterday #10

State election officials KT2000 Yesterday #11

Each precinct, city, county and state have different ballots, that are all printed and mailed locally FakeNoose Yesterday #12

Why don't we just get chips implanted in our foreheads? littlemissmartypants 22 hrs ago #13

Requiring states to submit lists of mail-in voters is not part of the mission of the USPS. summer_in_TX 21 hrs ago #15

This proposed rule won't be published officially until Monday. So far it doesn't show a docket number. summer_in_TX 21 hrs ago #16

Why? Figarosmom 18 hrs ago #18

A bar code tied to your name? WTF?? Bengus81 12 hrs ago #19

Nothin new Gum Logger 11 hrs ago #20

Maybe the U.S. Postal Service should go to churches and find out who isn't putting money in the collection plates! RedWhiteBlueIsRacist 4 hrs ago #23

Oh, FFS. It already takes 10 days to get an envelope to me from a bank 8 miles away. Vinca 4 hrs ago #24