Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Carville says he wouldn't seat Mamdani-backed Avila Chevalier in caucus: 'She's not a Democrat' [View all]choie
(7,112 posts)2. The gatekeepers are on full display today.
Feeling a bit threatened, Carville?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
17 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Carville says he wouldn't seat Mamdani-backed Avila Chevalier in caucus: 'She's not a Democrat' [View all]
AZLD4Candidate
Yesterday
OP
Carville needs to go F himself. The voters are clearly smarter than he is. They know what they want.
flashman13
Yesterday
#23
Carville is a Democratic "consultant" that has been working on campaigns since the 1980s.
flashman13
11 hrs ago
#68
tangential correction/clarification (whether full House could refuse to seat her)
GJGCA
12 hrs ago
#66
If the post quotes or paraphrases the person, it is not a violation of the policy. I am left of the Socialist Dems. My
3Hotdogs
23 hrs ago
#26
So you're more concerned with the use of quotation marks than the statements?
Callie1979
5 hrs ago
#76
Paraphrases? Do you or the original pster have sources that verify the "paraphrase" (it wasn't a quote)? I mean, if
KPN
20 hrs ago
#45
Unfortunately, my source was the reporting on WNYC the morning on Wednesday. She has also promoted fully
3Hotdogs
15 hrs ago
#56
I agree. And her past WILL be used to paint the entire party like it or not.
Callie1979
5 hrs ago
#74
Thanks. Fortunately, I don't have the ability to vote for or against her, so I don't have to research further. I would
KPN
8 hrs ago
#71
Thank you for this. Wow. She's a bit much for my taste if this is still what she believes.
VegasVet
20 hrs ago
#46
No. Someone made a statement. It isn't unreasonable to ask for proof. Don't be obtuse.
VegasVet
20 hrs ago
#47
Maybe he should actually talk to her instead of letting tweets some decades old influence him.
Eko
22 hrs ago
#35
The evidence is in the strawman over there. . .wait, it moved over there, passed another goalpost
AZLD4Candidate
14 hrs ago
#58
Libertarians are definitely not Republicans. While they may share an overall view on minimalist government, Libertarians
24601
8 hrs ago
#72