Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Carville says he wouldn't seat Mamdani-backed Avila Chevalier in caucus: 'She's not a Democrat' [View all]Callie1979
(1,495 posts)74. I agree. And her past WILL be used to paint the entire party like it or not.
But I didnt use quotes in my original post so I'M the bad guy.
This is how we trip over our own shoes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Carville says he wouldn't seat Mamdani-backed Avila Chevalier in caucus: 'She's not a Democrat' [View all]
AZLD4Candidate
Thursday
OP
Carville needs to go F himself. The voters are clearly smarter than he is. They know what they want.
flashman13
Thursday
#23
Carville is a Democratic "consultant" that has been working on campaigns since the 1980s.
flashman13
Yesterday
#68
tangential correction/clarification (whether full House could refuse to seat her)
GJGCA
Yesterday
#66
If the post quotes or paraphrases the person, it is not a violation of the policy. I am left of the Socialist Dems. My
3Hotdogs
Thursday
#26
So you're more concerned with the use of quotation marks than the statements?
Callie1979
23 hrs ago
#76
Paraphrases? Do you or the original pster have sources that verify the "paraphrase" (it wasn't a quote)? I mean, if
KPN
Yesterday
#45
Unfortunately, my source was the reporting on WNYC the morning on Wednesday. She has also promoted fully
3Hotdogs
Yesterday
#56
I agree. And her past WILL be used to paint the entire party like it or not.
Callie1979
23 hrs ago
#74
Thanks. Fortunately, I don't have the ability to vote for or against her, so I don't have to research further. I would
KPN
Yesterday
#71
Thank you for this. Wow. She's a bit much for my taste if this is still what she believes.
VegasVet
Yesterday
#46
No. Someone made a statement. It isn't unreasonable to ask for proof. Don't be obtuse.
VegasVet
Yesterday
#47
Maybe he should actually talk to her instead of letting tweets some decades old influence him.
Eko
Yesterday
#35
The evidence is in the strawman over there. . .wait, it moved over there, passed another goalpost
AZLD4Candidate
Yesterday
#58
Libertarians are definitely not Republicans. While they may share an overall view on minimalist government, Libertarians
24601
Yesterday
#72