Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,394 posts)
27. Once again, Raw Story gets its facts wrong. The court has not ordered payment to Carroll to be made on July 7
Sun Jul 5, 2026, 01:09 PM
6 hrs ago

And notwithstanding what Raw Story claims, neither the court records nor Roger Perloff make such a claim. What the court records, and Parloff, have stated is that the court rejected a request from Trump to delay the deadline for Trump's response to Carroll's motion seeking the disbursement of the funds currently held by the court pursuant to the agreement reached between Trump and Carroll in 2023.

The court hasn't yet decided whether to release the funds. I expect it will do so, but it has to receive and consider Trump's response first. As explained elsewhere in this thread, under the terms of the 2023 agreement between Trump and Carroll providing for the deposit of $5+ million to the registry, release of the funds to Carroll requires either a motion to the court or a stipulation of the parties. Trump, obviously, is not stipulating to the release of the funds, so Carroll has filed a motion. And under the rules of the court, Trump is entitled to file a response to that motion. Ordinarily, that response would be due in 14 days, but Carroll sought, and over Trump's objection, obtained an order reducing the time for Trump to respond from 14 days to 7 days. So Trump has to respond by July 7 and at that point, the judge can decide whether or not the funds should be released to Carroll or whether there is any reason not to do so at this time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Jesus fucking christ... buzzycrumbhunger Yesterday #1
Well, seems like he's overcompensating for SOMETHING! calimary 23 hrs ago #10
The $5 million plus interest is sitting in an escrow account and is probably controlled by the court. The court should OGBuzz Yesterday #2
Yes, a Court made Trump do that months ago. Weird they have not released it. riversedge Yesterday #3
Isn't the money that is with the court Quanto Magnus Yesterday #4
I think you might be thinking of the larger judgement, maybe $93mil? Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #6
That is probably it Quanto Magnus 41 min ago #37
You are correct that the money is held in a "registry" controlled by the court. There is a procedure for releasing it onenote 7 hrs ago #19
We will see on Tuesday but I have my doubts. Courts are afraid of Trump. Also she will probably never see the OGBuzz 2 hrs ago #35
All I expect to see on Tuesday is Trump's filing onenote 2 hrs ago #36
This silliness will be going on for years... Escape Yesterday #5
you would be wrong about that NJCher 23 hrs ago #13
He can't the SCOTUS of the United States has ruled in that he is guilty Botany Yesterday #7
The SOB wormed his way into $2bil. last year but won't pay what he owes. Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #8
How much you got, Donald? calimary 23 hrs ago #9
Classic Abuse Example: littlemissmartypants 23 hrs ago #11
shithead can not control ANYTHING anymore, he LOST. dave99 23 hrs ago #12
Not a lawyer? Carroll didn't just have to "ask" -- she had to file a motion. onenote 6 hrs ago #30
As part of his appeal Trump entered into an agreement with the court the funds would be disbursed directly to Carroll sop 22 hrs ago #14
That is not what the agreement provided. It set up a procedure for the release of the money - it is not "automatic." onenote 7 hrs ago #21
'Carroll v. Trump Stipulation and Order -- Document #210' sop 6 hrs ago #25
Key procedural provision onenote 6 hrs ago #26
"Attorney Roberta Kaplan cited a prior stipulation that payment would be due if the high court denied review." sop 6 hrs ago #28
What you actually stated: onenote 6 hrs ago #29
I could provide multiple sources to support my statement...NYT, WSJ, WaPo...but they're all behind a paywall. sop 5 hrs ago #32
So does that mean you think Carroll's lawyer doesn't know what she's doing? onenote 5 hrs ago #33
I'm sorry, you've lost me. sop 4 hrs ago #34
Judge Kaplan tells him to "pay up" and July 7th is the final final deadline FakeNoose 22 hrs ago #15
Wrong. The judge simply said that the deadline for Trump to file an opposition to Carroll's motion is July 7. onenote 21 hrs ago #16
When I defaulted on my student loans, the good people at PHEAA helped themselves to my paycheck Orrex 21 hrs ago #17
He gets a "say" because Carroll agreed to give him one. onenote 7 hrs ago #22
Thank you for that. Orrex 7 hrs ago #24
Deadbeat. Martin68 21 hrs ago #18
Trump tries again to squirm out of paying E. Jean Carroll $5M: attorney LetMyPeopleVote 7 hrs ago #20
Judge slaps down Trump's latest dodge in E. Jean Carroll case LetMyPeopleVote 7 hrs ago #23
Once again, Raw Story gets its facts wrong. The court has not ordered payment to Carroll to be made on July 7 onenote 6 hrs ago #27
He cannot be allowed to build that WH "ballroom" bunker. This is exactly. mahina 6 hrs ago #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump tries again to dela...»Reply #27