Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 1 dead, 1 injured in shooting near Detroit high school [View all]apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)73. "Reply #42 will be up held" - as if this is some kind of legal proceeding we're conducting here.
The enthusiasm "RKBA enthusiasts" and pro-NRA shills display in articles about people being shot is beyond morally callous. Even in a legitimate exercise of self-defense with a firearm - and this is far from having been shown to be a legitimate use of force - a certain sobriety and adult exercise of restraint should prevail in discussions about it.
None of that for our "pro gun progressives"*: there's giddy delight at the fact that someone has been shot and killed ("the young hoodlums chose poorly"; "I'll buy Paczkis for the lounge next week") that belies any decent regard for the solemn business of the taking of a human life, whether justified or not.
The non-stop pro-NRA shilling on DU from "RKBA enthusiasts" is one thing: phony as the pretense maintained to keep those posting privileges is, at least it's not celebrating, with the internet equivalent of huzzahs! and high-fives, the shooting and killing of another human being. That latter business, besides being morally repulsive, is quite another.
That mask inevitably slips once too often and for too long, however, and then there's a Meta post about it. And I'll be there to chime in my enthusiastic approval.
*(
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
IIRC I read you had to be in the reserves before you'd be considered for a regular cop job.
Robb
Feb 2013
#59
But, in the end, they did not shoot him. If he'd handed over his wallet, they would have likely left
Hoyt
Feb 2013
#77
There was no guarantee the thugs wouldn't have killed him if he had cooperated
slackmaster
Feb 2013
#43
"Necessary" or not, according to the laws we all live under it was justifiable
slackmaster
Feb 2013
#66
If he said one had a gun, and niether had anything that even resembles one.......
Socal31
Feb 2013
#54
I don't know the specifics of Michigan law, but in most states there is no requirement for parity...
slackmaster
Feb 2013
#67
Nice backtrack from your unrestrained enthusiasm for this shooting in #42 above.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#68
"Reply #42 will be up held" - as if this is some kind of legal proceeding we're conducting here.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#73