Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hard Assets

(274 posts)
8. Okay. For your education purposes. Nuclear or constitutional option
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:15 PM
Feb 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option

In U.S. politics, the nuclear option, also called the constitutional option, is when the presiding officer of the United States Senate disregards a rule or precedent, for example by asking the Senate to end a filibuster by majority vote. The rules of the Senate specify that ending a filibuster requires the consent 60 senators (out of 100) for legislation, 67 for amending a Senate rule. An opinion written by Vice President Richard Nixon in 1957 concluded that the U.S. Constitution grants the presiding officer the authority to override Senate rules in this way.[1] (The U.S. vice president is also president of the Senate.) If a majority vote to uphold the presiding officer, his interpretation of the rules becomes a precedent. In practice, the issue rarely arises as presiding officers generally follow established precedent, as interpreted by the Senate's parliamentarian.

Republicans won't play nice, so Reid needs to stop playing nice with the Republicans and give them what they deserve - complete disregard for their policies or amendments, or their WHINES.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I was just about the launch this one. I'll be watching on CSPAN. Thanks for posting. eom Purveyor Feb 2013 #1
He's not going to have the votes, so I don't know what happens when cloture fails--is that it for TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #2
Actually they have the votes. Hard Assets Feb 2013 #4
No R's Will Cross AndyTiedye Feb 2013 #17
Actually they didn't, 58-40-1. PoliticAverse Feb 2013 #18
Obama can recess appoint him. HooptieWagon Feb 2013 #6
Awwwww.....Poor Poor Harry..... SoCalMusicLover Feb 2013 #3
Or declare the reform dead, and invoke the nuclear option. Hard Assets Feb 2013 #5
Just what are the details of the 'nuclear option'? eom Purveyor Feb 2013 #7
Okay. For your education purposes. Nuclear or constitutional option Hard Assets Feb 2013 #8
Thanks for that. Purveyor Feb 2013 #10
Yeah....Sure....That's Gonna Happen SoCalMusicLover Feb 2013 #12
He's been playing footsie with them for a long time... AAO Feb 2013 #13
can he still use the nuclear option to change the rules Coolest Ranger Feb 2013 #9
You can always use the nuclear option. That's why it's the nuclear option. nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #11
I love the smell of radioactive republicans in the morning! AAO Feb 2013 #14
58- 40. BumRushDaShow Feb 2013 #15
Did all Democrats vote to end debate? And who didnt vote? nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #16
Here is the roll call BumRushDaShow Feb 2013 #19
Thank you. nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #20
Diaper boy wasn't at the committee meeting either davidpdx Feb 2013 #21
the longer this goes on, the more pissed I get at Reid 0rganism Feb 2013 #22
blame the republicans blue_heron Feb 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate Democrats to force...»Reply #8