Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
46. Assuming ALL the "blunt object" deaths were hammers...
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 12:41 AM
Mar 2013
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/offenses/expanded_information/data/shrtable_08.html

Let's play around with this...

In 2009, three times as many people were killed by "firearms, type not stated" than were killed by "blunt objects." Reality says the "blunt objects" were more than likely beer bottles, pieces of 2x4, and baseball bats rather than hammers; did you ever try to hit a moving object like a person with a hammer?

If all the "firearms, type not stated" were rifles, four times as many people were killed by rifles than by "hammers." In reality, most "firearms, type not stated" were pistols because pistols are so easy to conceal.

As someone else on this thread has pointed out, few to no people buy hammers with the intent of killing people. (Baseball bats are purchased with the intent of hitting baseballs, unless you play for the Rockies or the Mariners but we won't get into that...) Nearly everyone who buys a gun does so with the intent of killing with it...whether it's deer, bears, intruders, criminals, enemy soldiers, people fuckin' with the dope trade, cops, their husband...the number of people who buy guns specifically to compete in shooting contests is extremely low, and their guns are very complex.
There were more people killed with hammers? really? robinlynne Mar 2013 #1
No. Facts: elleng Mar 2013 #2
Thank-you elleng. excellent link. This is the first time I heard the "hammer" story. robinlynne Mar 2013 #6
It's been one of the official NRA talking points since Sandy Hook Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #32
"hammering home" their points of disinformation Roy Rolling Mar 2013 #36
In 2011 there were 323 murders with rifles, 496 with blunt objects hack89 Mar 2013 #29
We're not supposed to say gun lovers have a problem "down there" Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2013 #3
Correct on Both Counts IrishAyes Mar 2013 #43
can we do both? fantase56 Mar 2013 #4
lol robinlynne Mar 2013 #7
Some of us have been saying that all along Hekate Mar 2013 #5
Some gun humper finally slips and tells the truth. Zoeisright Mar 2013 #8
Let's get gun control taken care of first mpcamb Mar 2013 #9
gun fetish is sexual for them sigmasix Mar 2013 #10
well, well, well, now we know what we always knew... mountain grammy Mar 2013 #11
Gun nut admits that the gun is an extension of the penis for them. onehandle Mar 2013 #12
Mr. Wells IrishAyes Mar 2013 #44
Sounds like he's half-cocked. Orrex Mar 2013 #13
I thought it was about protecting our rights. caseymoz Mar 2013 #14
It's time for he and the rest of republicans to be de-balled. BVictor1 Mar 2013 #15
Uh.... let's see now.... if Turbineguy Mar 2013 #16
make it a package deal then, let's see some real hysteria *nt Alamuti Lotus Mar 2013 #17
So how does he actually know? TexasTowelie Mar 2013 #18
Well, if you put it that way... defacto7 Mar 2013 #19
No one should ever get THAT attached to his gun. Ken Burch Mar 2013 #20
Interesting analogy '...want me to get castrated because you’re families are having too many kids..' freshwest Mar 2013 #21
Kudos IrishAyes Mar 2013 #47
This newest Tea Potty craze is sweeping the nation: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #22
Hilarous. nt ZombieHorde Mar 2013 #23
Rather Freudian. Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #24
Guns? Phallic? deutsey Mar 2013 #25
That would be a lot more persuasive if he would demonstrate it himself. n/t jtuck004 Mar 2013 #26
Nope. I'm not going there lunatica Mar 2013 #27
In his case.. sendero Mar 2013 #28
Snope it. rgbecker Mar 2013 #30
Sums up Society's fascination with guns....... joanbarnes Mar 2013 #31
Somebody's man card needs to be reissued. KamaAina Mar 2013 #33
Reminds me of a Longmire classic... Redfairen Mar 2013 #34
Why can’t we have it all? MyOpinion-2 Mar 2013 #35
I didn't know a gun could make a good proteases AlphaCentauri Mar 2013 #37
LOL Jumpin Jack Fletch Mar 2013 #38
So he's actually saying EC Mar 2013 #39
That's sure the way I view what he is saying davidpdx Mar 2013 #41
The bigger the gun, the smaller the penis. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #40
Well... if so... then let the dick cutting begin! 4lbs Mar 2013 #42
Gun regulation can be compared to castration pangaia Mar 2013 #45
Assuming ALL the "blunt object" deaths were hammers... jmowreader Mar 2013 #46
They are realistic resolutions, nothing worth whining about.. and-justice-for-all Mar 2013 #48
Guys who think they have some need to strut through Wal Mart with a pistol perched in their pants apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #49
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Illinois Republican Legis...»Reply #46