Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Police: 4 people shot, 1 fatally, in Coney Island [View all]mbperrin
(7,672 posts)32. So you have no objection to banning rifles of all sorts because they are not any more
effective at killing than an ordinary handgun?
Me either. So let's do it, since by your post, you have proven that you can't protect yourself better with a rifle - totally ineffective and not needed.
Now we're making some progress!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So you have no objection to banning rifles of all sorts because they are not any more
mbperrin
Mar 2013
#32
You've already admitted to views so far outside the mainstream that they don't deserve consideration
baldguy
Mar 2013
#17
So when you asserted that my post was against all gun control, you were incorrect, yes?
Peter cotton
Mar 2013
#21
So when you asserted that my post was against all gun control, you were incorrect, yes?
Peter cotton
Mar 2013
#28
You're more likely to be killed be someone you know than someone you don't know.
baldguy
Mar 2013
#38