Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Socal31

(2,484 posts)
2. Misleading headline according to this paragraph buried in the article:
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 11:50 PM
Apr 2013

"The collection published today has not been leaked, but Mr Assange said WikiLeaks had been working for the past year to analyse and assess a vast amount of data held at the U.S. national archives before releasing it in a searchable form.

Mr Assange said WikiLeaks had developed sophisticated technical systems to deal with ‘complex and voluminous’ data.

Top secret documents were not available, while some others were lost or irreversibly corrupted for periods including December 1975 and March and June 1976, said Mr Assange"


Wikidatacondensing just doesn't have the same ring to it.

A member of the Assange Defamation Squad OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #1
Leaves the toilet seat up!?!? DeSwiss Apr 2013 #11
As opposed to the benevolent sexism of putting the seat down? hughee99 Apr 2013 #29
No. DeSwiss Apr 2013 #33
LOL...You are so right OnyxCollie LiberalLovinLug Apr 2013 #22
Misleading headline according to this paragraph buried in the article: Socal31 Apr 2013 #2
Good catch, wikicollated...nt Paul E Ester Apr 2013 #5
It's a terrible headline because it's Daily Mail. nt Hissyspit Apr 2013 #7
"Wikidatacondensing" SkyDaddy7 Apr 2013 #15
40 years and still some of the docs are classified. Ash_F Apr 2013 #3
Actually I wouldnt hesitate to bet that some of it was classified to protect sources as well as cstanleytech Apr 2013 #16
Couple canned searches to play with. Paul E Ester Apr 2013 #4
Wow, that database is very sophisticated Ash_F Apr 2013 #6
The New Privatization! Fuddnik Apr 2013 #9
Really, you would think the Rightwingers would sing this thing's praises. /nt Ash_F Apr 2013 #10
Awww. shit! Fuddnik Apr 2013 #8
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #12
3 years covering the fall of Nixon and Ford,...sounds like a party. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #13
BBC News - Wikileaks publishes 1.7m US diplomatic records dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #14
It seems to be information that's already available to everyone: struggle4progress Apr 2013 #17
Whistleblowing is where you zero in on a wrong treestar Apr 2013 #18
Here, it's not even dumping: all these documents were already available from the US government, struggle4progress Apr 2013 #19
Next up for Wikileaks: The Greater Metropolitan Washington D.C. phonebook! randome Apr 2013 #20
"Wikileaks names names in new release of DC white pages!" struggle4progress Apr 2013 #21
I'm sure Kissinger Associates are delighted at your efforts to downplay this. Here's their number. leveymg Apr 2013 #24
I'm sure Kissinger's clients are well-aware of Kissinger's power-based real-politik approach, struggle4progress Apr 2013 #27
On his clients and their ethics, we surely agree. As for the Nat'l Security Archive at GWU, I've leveymg Apr 2013 #34
oh my treestar Apr 2013 #25
Congratulations! Your efforts to get the dupe thread frozen kicked this one into the top 25! leveymg Apr 2013 #26
Yeah, I didn't want to see 1.7 million new LBN threads on forty-year-old long-available struggle4progress Apr 2013 #28
He may not have broken any law this time, but it was a newsworthy public service anyway. eom leveymg Apr 2013 #30
Maybe or maybe not, but IMO in any case not every old cable in his "release" becomes LBN thereby struggle4progress Apr 2013 #31
Meanwhile, journalists across the world are combing through names of overseas tax evaders... Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #23
And it's quite wonderful that the one does not deny the other... LanternWaste Apr 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»So that's what Assange ha...»Reply #2