Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
38. There is a reason it is called the "nuclear option."
Thu May 23, 2013, 11:59 AM
May 2013

Because, just like real nuclear weapons, the plan only gets used once, creates great destruction, and ensures that your opponent will attempt to use the same weapon against you, with overwhelming force, practically guaranteeing your own eventual destruction as well.

Furthermore, Harry Reid and President Obama, working as a team, have managed to generate an unusually strong list of achievements over the past three years by simply turning the greed and small-mindedness of Republicans against themselves. Reid did a much better job of holding back the Bush Administration with the filibuster than Republicans have done against us, because Republicans specialize in exploiting laws and rules, rather than working within them.

Worse, there is always the chance that Republicans, who work best outside of the laws they pretend to create, will steal elections until they regain control of the Senate, at exactly the same time that Jeb Bush must win election in order to control eight years' worth of incriminating documents generated by his idiot brother.

At which point we become the Fourth Reich, because there will be no way to slow them down as Harry Reid did for eight long, miserable years.

The filibuster is our game, and as long as the Republicans are forced to play it (with the inherent disadvantages their malevolence imposes), we retain the initiative. Take it away from Republicans now and they will immediately return to the extralegal means they prefer, until they can use the new conditions against us.

Or, you can say Harry Reid is a spineless coward and walk away, which increases the chances that Reid will actually have to resort to this option someday and eventually doom us all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't know why he keeps bringing it up sharp_stick May 2013 #1
maybe he likes messing with us Enrique May 2013 #3
Harry Reid needs to resign from his Majority Leader role Mr. David May 2013 #2
He's scared of what 2014 might bring 4dsc May 2013 #6
Then he's a moron. jeff47 May 2013 #10
Why? Presume they take control after the 2014 election. What does eliminating the filibuster gain 24601 May 2013 #19
Because they want that veto jeff47 May 2013 #22
who might that be among Democratic senators? rurallib May 2013 #9
The problem is that if he does, more likely than not we'd get Chuck Schumer. Arkana May 2013 #40
this is exactly it. it's a threat he keeps using to get something else. unblock May 2013 #4
We need someone who doesn't play these games tblue May 2013 #28
Amen! n/t SylviaD May 2013 #36
Well, tie me to a fencepost Stuckinthebush May 2013 #5
I am so surprised about Harry Reid.. Stuart G May 2013 #8
There is a reason it is called the "nuclear option." sofa king May 2013 #38
I am surprised that Harry Reid tblue May 2013 #42
Like Lucy with the football. hobbit709 May 2013 #7
Spineless worm. [nt] Jester Messiah May 2013 #11
Amen mpcamb May 2013 #21
The Dems just called asking for money. GeorgeGist May 2013 #12
I'm with her. tblue May 2013 #29
No one could have possibly predicted Reid might change his mind! AndyA May 2013 #13
Reid is from Searchlight, Nevada Plucketeer May 2013 #16
He was never going to do it. tblue May 2013 #30
I'm shocked! Just shocked! City Lights May 2013 #14
The reports of his growth of a pair of testicles were premature. n/t Agnosticsherbet May 2013 #15
When is Harry... ReRe May 2013 #17
Shut your pie hole, Harry... awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #18
There's a shock. cyberswede May 2013 #20
He is complicit in it all! Dustlawyer May 2013 #23
Reid's Counterpoint PA May 2013 #24
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! OnyxCollie May 2013 #25
Different interpretation... babylonsister May 2013 #26
Strange that no one's paying your post any attention when the WaPo article was released on the same BlueCaliDem May 2013 #32
One interpretation is supported by Reid's repeated prior actions Alhena May 2013 #43
he already caved on this months ago Doctor_J May 2013 #27
Of course, he does. No one can afford to have the fiction of "two" parties actually stripped away villager May 2013 #31
. Dragonfli May 2013 #33
If he does back away, it'd be no surprise sakabatou May 2013 #34
Naturally. n/t Fearless May 2013 #35
SUR-PRISE, SUR-PRISE, SUR-PRISE! Pab Sungenis May 2013 #37
Of course. Arkana May 2013 #39
This is no longer a tactic. xxqqqzme May 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Reid appears to back away...»Reply #38