Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Syrian army, Hezbollah attack rebels in border town: opposition [View all]oberliner
(58,724 posts)70. Hezbollah confirms heavily involved in Syria conflict
Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah announced Saturday the large-scale involvement of his party in the war in neighboring Syria, saying his partys fighting against Syrian rebels aimed at protecting the resistance group.
We are now in a totally new phase that began a few weeks ago. This new phase aims at fortifying the resistance and protecting its backbone, fortifying Lebanon and protecting its backbone, Nasrallah said.
We will assume this responsibility and endure all the sacrifices and consequences that come with taking such a stance, he said.
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2013/May-25/218352-hezbollah-says-fighting-in-syria-opposes-importing-crisis-to-lebanon.ashx#ixzz2ULTiY9jf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The "more religious rebel groups" are Sunni radicals and consider Shiites like Hezbollah apostates.
Comrade Grumpy
May 2013
#8
I agree the rebels that are fundamentalist and foreign have much more toxic ideologies
socialsecurityisAAA
May 2013
#18
U.S. involvement in the Middle East has less to do than the Arab Spring movement.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2013
#15
You are simply wrong. It began with peaceful protest in 2011. See links below.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2013
#21
No it is not "either Assad or al Qaeda." That's the line Assad has been selling since this started.
pampango
May 2013
#32
"The Center for American Progress is a progressive public policy research and advocacy organization.
pampango
May 2013
#57
Just because you say it does not make it so. The Center for American Progress is a great source of
pampango
May 2013
#61
It's a well known fact that think tanks in the United States only promote the objectives of their
socialsecurityisAAA
May 2013
#62
The U.S. government should facilitate the people's ability to make those choices or any other.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2013
#39
NO! The US government should absolutely NOT "facilitate" any involvement in the region.
riderinthestorm
May 2013
#56
If you disagree with the history, post links to show it beginning with violence.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2013
#46
Demonstrators were killing policemen and burning down government buildings...
Comrade Grumpy
May 2013
#44
You're leaving out the part about snipers and attacks on policemen and gov't buildings that provoked
leveymg
May 2013
#52
Syrian Rebels have never been peaceful, the very changes they are calling for,
socialsecurityisAAA
May 2013
#19
What they have under Assad is a Minority Rule by a dictator and his cronies.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2013
#40
If the alternative is Sharia law, the secularism of Assad will always be preferable.
socialsecurityisAAA
May 2013
#63
The article you posted didn't represent a non violent protest, destroying property is violent.
socialsecurityisAAA
May 2013
#67
It's already been effecting Lebanon. There was more fighting in Tripoli last night.
Comrade Grumpy
May 2013
#47
And the Sunni backed jihadis were/are also in Libya and Egypt and Tunisia... nt
riderinthestorm
May 2013
#55