Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DallasNE

(8,010 posts)
17. There Is A Reason The Law Says "Exclusively"
Mon May 27, 2013, 02:09 PM
May 2013

There is no reason for the current IRS "clarification" that says exclusively means primarily. That was a political decision by Eisenhower that was completely arbitrary. The current IRS director could rescind that, going back to the actual language in the law, but that will never happen Republicans will never stand for it. If the issue was truly tax-exempt status then these groups could reapply as PAC's. It's not. The only issue is keeping the donor lists secret. The reason is clear. These donors want to avoid a backlash for their political activity. Look at what happened with Olive Garden when they announced they were cutting workers hours to avoid provisions of Obamacare. The boycott hit their bottom line, as it should. These people simply want their cake and eat it too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Groups Targeted by I.R.S....»Reply #17