Latest Breaking News

cstanleytech

(28,327 posts)

23. All that those links are doing is proving my point which is you have nothing to show that it causes

Tue May 28, 2013, 02:59 PM

May 2013

cancer which is what you did and dont try to BS me or anyone else by claiming you didnt do that because you did when you refered to them as "e-cancers".
Now do I agree that they should be looked at to make sure they comply with all the laws? Sure I agree but trying to claim they cause cancer without evidence is silly.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

France considers electronic cigarette ban in public places [View all] alp227 May 2013 OP

Prove to me that the 'filth' being blown in everyone else's face ... Trajan May 2013 #1

Lets ban perfume and scented deodorants too DJ13 May 2013 #2

Sigh. Another DUer who is completely ignorant about e-cigs. phleshdef May 2013 #3

+ 1. n/t truedelphi May 2013 #7

+1 bitchkitty May 2013 #41

+100 nt Mojorabbit May 2013 #46

What filth? They blow water vapor as a byproduct NickB79 May 2013 #4

Lot of people in South California are sucking and blowing these things. . . Journeyman May 2013 #5

Electronic cancer? Oh, scary. Better go hide in your closet. Comrade Grumpy May 2013 #9

Show me one, independent, peer-reviewed, scientific study to quell my concern. . . Journeyman May 2013 #17

You're the one asserting they're harmful. The burden of proof is on you. n/t backscatter712 May 2013 #25

Here you go . . . Journeyman May 2013 #27

And as I said in the other post, what the FDA found means virtually nothing. phleshdef May 2013 #30

And the CDC Report means nothing. Nor do the other University researchers cited. Nor. . . Journeyman May 2013 #31

I posted university studies in my other posts. I guess you are ignoring those as well. phleshdef May 2013 #33

E-cancers? bitchkitty May 2013 #42

A perversion of a phrase from "A Clockwork Orange," itself a perversion. . . Journeyman May 2013 #44

Wow, how completely ignorant. phleshdef May 2013 #11

I'm glad you have such faith in corporate marketing. . . Journeyman May 2013 #15

Umm actually the onus is on those claiming it has a negative side effect like you cstanleytech May 2013 #18

California SB 648 will address my concerns, but if you insist . . . Journeyman May 2013 #21

All that those links are doing is proving my point which is you have nothing to show that it causes cstanleytech May 2013 #23

And yet the FDA study specifically says, the e-cancers it tested . . . Journeyman May 2013 #26

The FDA study was very flawed and has been refuted by many other reputable sources. phleshdef May 2013 #29

I've not indulged ANY coporate marketing on this topic. I just read the SCIENCE behind it. phleshdef May 2013 #28

e-cancer, nah, those aren't shit....you want to see some deadly shit snooper2 May 2013 #16

Cars in CA cause cancer (and ambulances have warning stickers on them there stating that as well) The Straight Story May 2013 #32

Heh Heh .... jaysunb May 2013 #45

Do you also want to ban the Nicorette Inhaler and Quickmist? Live and Learn May 2013 #52

Both of those are marketed as smoking cessation aids. . . Journeyman May 2013 #54

I buy local and know EXACTLY what is in my liquid. jayfish May 2013 #61

Hmm davidthegnome May 2013 #6

Quelle fromage! "A potential gateway to smoking tobacco." Comrade Grumpy May 2013 #8

drugs addicts will do and say anything to justify their addicitions nt msongs May 2013 #10

Do you have something to say about the safety of e-cigarettes? Comrade Grumpy May 2013 #14

It's msongs. What do YOU think? Occulus May 2013 #48

But what of my addiction to mocking DU's lame posters? Trajan May 2013 #24

LOL! That tickled me. Thanks! :) n/t bitchkitty May 2013 #43

so will assholes frylock May 2013 #36

Judgmental people suck, Occulus May 2013 #47

What will they do to justify their inane and petulant posts though? nt LanternWaste May 2013 #57

More authoritarian prudery. backscatter712 May 2013 #12

Goes too far. These people are trying to quit. They should be given all latitude necessary to make Aristus May 2013 #13

That's dumb JustAnotherGen May 2013 #19

Patches are a joke. Tried them and it wasnt the same. JesterCS May 2013 #50

My Ankylosing JustAnotherGen May 2013 #55

my husband tried to quit lots of times to no avail. he was able to quit with chantix ejpoeta May 2013 #56

Filth!? Really?! thefool_wa May 2013 #20

Been on e-cigs for about 2 weeks now ... brett_jv May 2013 #22

A lot of what makes e-cigs helpful is it lets you do the oral fixation thing. backscatter712 May 2013 #34

+1 nt Live and Learn May 2013 #53

Keep breathing in that car exhaust mokawanis May 2013 #35

Know who says quitting smoking is the hardest addiction to quit ? olddots May 2013 #37

I remember in the 50s when researchers were becoming aware of the dangers of nicotine... olddad56 May 2013 #38

Authoritarian idiocy. Xithras May 2013 #39

One year and seven months tavernier May 2013 #40

I will be the first to light up JesterCS May 2013 #49

Crowded sidewalk cafes in Paris allow the real thing, making LibDemAlways May 2013 #51

Post removed Post removed May 2013 #58

Welcome to DU my friend! hrmjustin May 2013 #60

So twisted that anti-smoking folks want to ban these too Cal Carpenter May 2013 #59