Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Newt Gingrich Would Send U.S. Marshals To Arrest ‘Activist’ Judges [View all]kiranon
(1,739 posts)16. Perhaps now they see the danger in siding with the Republicans - even they are not safe.
What fools Roberts, Scalia, Alito and Thomas have been. Do they want to be hauled in front of Congress or have their colleagues dragged from the Court? Roberts, Scalia, Alito and Thomas have ruined the status and prestige of the Supreme Count such that clowns like Gingrich can threaten to rein in the Supreme Court justices as if they were criminals. The Court needs to remind politicians that they are the third branch of government and not subject to Congress's approval by way of arrest, interrogation and removal. Court needs to get rid of the "Citizens United" decision and go on from there to save the Republic and themselves.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
126 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Newt Gingrich Would Send U.S. Marshals To Arrest ‘Activist’ Judges [View all]
bluevoter4life
Dec 2011
OP
I can't tell whether he's just saying this junk to get attention, and very well understands that
amandabeech
Dec 2011
#3
Would also need to increase federal spending to fund the Marshalls and prisons
bluevoter4life
Dec 2011
#5
I seriously don't think Newt plays with a full deck. I find him very unstable. n/t
RKP5637
Dec 2011
#9
Yep, well might be ... someone on one thread (I don't have link) also said he might be
RKP5637
Dec 2011
#30
Either that or vowing to eliminate every single regulation ever authorized.
amandabeech
Dec 2011
#125
Yes, but, Cheney did not think much of those 3 branches of government, as I recall.
dixiegrrrrl
Dec 2011
#84
He didn't like any branch of government that would not lend itself to a Rasputin like the unitary
amandabeech
Dec 2011
#126
Well. Just think back on when he had some power. He did do terrible things.
The Wielding Truth
Dec 2011
#87
And the interesting thing is that when he takes a dive he may take Romney out with him
grantcart
Dec 2011
#38
If you read David Icke as metaphor, as literature and allegory instead of literal truth - RIGHT ON
saras
Dec 2011
#64
Yep, I always read it as a metaphor, words really do pale to describe them anymore. n/t
RKP5637
Dec 2011
#86
Perhaps now they see the danger in siding with the Republicans - even they are not safe.
kiranon
Dec 2011
#16
Going after a liberal Supreme Court Justice would destroy the power and prestige of the Court.
kiranon
Dec 2011
#79
he would be the most interesting political leader in the Western world since the 1930's
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2011
#13
Leroy's an attention whore who will say anything politically outrageous for the publicity
Zorro
Dec 2011
#21
'Course in Newtie's world, "activist judges" only lean in one direction - LEFT!
housewolf
Dec 2011
#24
Even other repub candidates backed away from this insanity (well, Romney and Paul at least).
Skip Intro
Dec 2011
#36
Dictators arrest judges, Newt. What part of "independent judiciary do you not understand?" If you
yellowcanine
Dec 2011
#37
He could start with Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia and Thomas for Citizens United.
W T F
Dec 2011
#45
This is why the NDAA is so important. Do we want it be administered at Newt's discretion?
ScottLand
Dec 2011
#55
Well, Newt, most of the federal courts are controlled by Republican appointees
NewJeffCT
Dec 2011
#60
If Obama had made the same statement, the Rethugs would be calling for his head.
Denninmi
Dec 2011
#65
And what would Newtie do when those Marshalls flat out refused to do it?
arbusto_baboso
Dec 2011
#73
about time. I've been impatiently waiting for this move. All is again good with the world.
ChairmanAgnostic
Dec 2011
#76
His ignorance of the Constitution and the workings of US government is really astonishing.
ChadwickHenryWard
Dec 2011
#92
Actually I think he does know how the Founders intended for things to work....
Swede Atlanta
Dec 2011
#104
this is gonna be like reagan, 20 years later we'll realize that he had dementia
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2011
#96
This is the path to plutocracy...oh, um I think we are already there.....
Swede Atlanta
Dec 2011
#102