Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1ProudAtheist

(346 posts)
24. I Know So
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:29 PM
Sep 2013

Hillary and Bill despise the Bushes. And Hillary would have had no problem whipping a congress with a super majority into passing a REAL healthcare Bill. And we definitely would not have this sequester, and probably not be having to deal with the baggers and the orange boner either. Hillary is one woman that you NEVER want to cross. Wait and see.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This has one rec? What the hell is wrong here? Autumn Sep 2013 #1
I know. Right? Gawd. A day without an BO-bashfest on DU closeupready Sep 2013 #17
I'm sometimes critical of PBO, but I just gave this another rec & would APPLAUD him loudly for whathehell Sep 2013 #64
You posted 3 minutes later than the OP. You may want to wait a few more... AAO Sep 2013 #25
As a food stamp user I am damn glad he is taking this stand. The rethugs are going to cut food jwirr Sep 2013 #40
LBN moves slower than the other forums, particularly GD. Le Taz Hot Sep 2013 #45
171 recs now. Good enough? n/t n2doc Sep 2013 #67
I'm glad to see him take a stand on this. It's outrageous to pay corporations SharonAnn Sep 2013 #2
Yay! I like linking the stamps to the economy, some people I know personally djean111 Sep 2013 #3
Sent a note of thanks to the White House Tigress DEM Sep 2013 #4
They are forgetting that all of the money winds up in the grocery industry Mr.Bill Sep 2013 #5
for every buck spent questionseverything Sep 2013 #54
K & R. I hope the house vote goes the other way, but if not, veto all the way! sueh Sep 2013 #6
K & R. Call those randian republicans and kick some tail. freshwest Sep 2013 #7
As Usual 1ProudAtheist Sep 2013 #8
Instead of criticizing Frances Sep 2013 #9
I worked For 1ProudAtheist Sep 2013 #10
You really think Hillary would have done different... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #23
I Know So 1ProudAtheist Sep 2013 #24
Bill seems to like GHW a lot.... AAO Sep 2013 #26
NOT 1ProudAtheist Sep 2013 #31
Bill is the son GHW never had Skittles Sep 2013 #33
ACA is exactly what Hillary proposed when campaigning... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #34
Where Were You 1ProudAtheist Sep 2013 #38
Yes, single payer is the only solution... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #41
To "despise" them... sendero Sep 2013 #63
Agreed. Corporatists all.... dotymed Sep 2013 #51
When did candidate Obama ever promise to prosecute the former administration? Flatulo Sep 2013 #28
During The 2008 1ProudAtheist Sep 2013 #29
I honestly don't recall that. Will look into it. Flatulo Sep 2013 #32
We are dealing with a zombie PUMA here. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #35
If he did it would be easy to link to it. former9thward Sep 2013 #52
Wrong-he said we need to look forward-here's the clip: jenmito Sep 2013 #57
Mrs. Clinton did have a spine to last through the relentless attacks by Rs on her in 2008. Sunlei Sep 2013 #47
Oh bullshit.. get a clue. Cha Sep 2013 #16
I Would Prefer 1ProudAtheist Sep 2013 #22
I would prefer posters cite objective sources for their claims. LanternWaste Sep 2013 #58
My bet... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #36
Could be.. I wondered where he got his "limp" talking points from. Cha Sep 2013 #37
The more I see... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #42
Oh, but Hillary isn't a corporatist... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #43
It better be one threat the prez follows through on. I want less standing down and more standing up. ancianita Sep 2013 #11
My feelings exactly. nt snappyturtle Sep 2013 #27
Why would he not veto it? Holy shit, these people need to live, gopiscrap Sep 2013 #12
Here is a question. Does this "cut" also hit those serving in the military who can "work"? cstanleytech Sep 2013 #13
Care to explain JohninPA Sep 2013 #50
No just wondering if they are going to apply it equally to everyone who is able to work cstanleytech Sep 2013 #59
Threatens? Plucketeer Sep 2013 #14
Actually the second article said.. Cha Sep 2013 #18
OMG, yes! Loving that spine! closeupready Sep 2013 #15
Of course he will.. thanks cal Cha Sep 2013 #19
Mr. President , Vanje Sep 2013 #20
ahem ... why would he have to veto it littlewolf Sep 2013 #21
you are spot on and not missing anything.... nevergiveup Sep 2013 #30
Kicked and recommended juajen Sep 2013 #39
He by God BETTER veto it Demeter Sep 2013 #44
White House should place more exact examples of who would be cut off Sunlei Sep 2013 #46
the RW are a bunch of animals heaven05 Sep 2013 #48
That's good bread_and_roses Sep 2013 #49
Score one for BO and the American public. Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #53
Good. That's a threat worth making. n/t DirkGently Sep 2013 #55
many would get malnourished, get weaker, get infections and disease ridden Divine Discontent Sep 2013 #56
He better not have to. Bradical79 Sep 2013 #60
well that's nice from a federal perspective however from a state perspective different story azurnoir Sep 2013 #61
Talk is cheap...... BlueJac Sep 2013 #62
The President should get credit for making this statement Maedhros Sep 2013 #65
The Republicans are free to be as draconian and evil as they want without any backlash... Kablooie Sep 2013 #66
Yeah, well, we'll see. Not holding my breath that they finally go against their paymasters, the 1%. blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #68
The GOP members of the House make me sick. Beacool Sep 2013 #69
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #70
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House Threatens Vet...»Reply #24