Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(177,385 posts)
25. Crap. The trial for the voter id case may not take place until after 2014 elections
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 05:25 PM
Nov 2013

This could be very sad news http://txredistricting.org/post/66123340534/disagreement-on-whether-trial-in-texas-voter-id-case

While the parties were able to agree on a number of issues, they were not able to agree on a single discovery schedule. Instead, the Justice Department - joined by MALC, the NAACP, and Texas League of Young Voters - submitted one proposal, the State of Texas another, and the Veasey plaintiffs a third.

The major division centered around how long it would take to get the case ready for trial - with DOJ and the State of Texas each proposing schedules that would set trial in the case for March 2015.

However, the Veasey plaintiffs told the court that a 2015 was too late because it would come after the November 2014 elections:

The Veasey plaintiffs propose a schedule that - unlike the other parties’ schedule - would provide an opportunity for plaintiffs to obtain relief on behalf of Texas voters in time for the November 2014 elections, the first major turnout elections in which Texas seeks to enforce the Voter ID law. The Veasey plaintiffs believe it is critically important to obtain a decision on SB 14’s validity before, not after, the first major elections, and they further believe it is feasible for the parties and the Court to have a trial on such a schedule.


Instead, under the Veasey plaintiffs schedule, the court would hold trial in September 2014.

DOJ told the court, however, that a limited period of discovery after the 2014 election would let evidence from that election be considered at trial. DOJ also argued that the need for extensive database discovery and other discovery issues would make it hard to try the case before the 2014 election.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Come on Texas women newfie11 Nov 2013 #1
"for the first time in a long time, the Democrat is as well-known as the Republican" justabob Nov 2013 #2
Actually that's great news. Merely a 6% lead for Abbot must be freaking out the Teaparts. Zen Democrat Nov 2013 #3
OH FUCK. COME ON, TEXAS WOMEN! ancianita Nov 2013 #4
Neither one of them is on the ballot in 2013. LisaL Nov 2013 #7
I want to see a greater momentum in polling. I'm anxious that she'll be outspent, out-media'd. ancianita Nov 2013 #8
This should be a no-brainer, joshdawg Nov 2013 #5
We have to overcome the voter ID laws in Texas lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #6
Abbott almost made himself ineligible to vote. LisaL Nov 2013 #9
that is almost funny lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #11
It really is. LisaL Nov 2013 #13
The case should come to trial before the 2014 General Election Gothmog Nov 2013 #17
Crap. The trial for the voter id case may not take place until after 2014 elections Gothmog Nov 2013 #25
Abbott is a more intelligent Rick Perry. Forgive me stating the obvious, everyone is more Dustlawyer Nov 2013 #10
How smart could he actually be? LisaL Nov 2013 #12
Like I said, being smarter than Rick Perry is not a very high bar! Dustlawyer Nov 2013 #16
I was at the same firm as Greg in the 1980s Gothmog Nov 2013 #18
Sorry to say, but u find that encouraging! Dustlawyer Nov 2013 #21
Greg is not that smart and he is mean Gothmog Nov 2013 #22
I have been a toxic tort plaintiff's attorney. Dustlawyer Nov 2013 #23
Greg's inherent character is going to come out Gothmog Nov 2013 #24
Wendy can do this. jsr Nov 2013 #14
As much as I support Wendy Davis Dopers_Greed Nov 2013 #15
Paul Begala has a good point of view Gothmog Nov 2013 #20
Juanita Jean loves this polling Gothmog Nov 2013 #19
Polls which do not force undecided to decide are useless 851-977 Nov 2013 #26
You're assuming the undecided will vote at all Major Nikon Nov 2013 #27
I didn't assume that 100% of the undecided will "vote at all" 851-977 Nov 2013 #30
Way to early to mean much 1KansasDem Nov 2013 #28
Texass goes GOP. In other news, water is wet. blkmusclmachine Nov 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Abbott Leads Davis by 6 P...»Reply #25