AP SOURCE: NO RIGHT TO ENRICH IN IRAN DEAL

[7962]

67. Wrong. Because in the beginning, they said it was for peaceful use; for power generation.

I dont understand how you look at either part of that sentence and call it false. THATS why I answered the previous post about; post #2. Again, the subject of medical use had not come up at that time. When it did, I answered that question factually as well. There is nothing wrong with either of my statements. Neither are wrong, which means taken alone, they are also correct.
My initial comment was an answer to post #2, which mentioned that Iran had never said they were developing a weapon. I simply stated what they DID say they were doing. They themselves never mentioned that they needed medical material. In the beginning it was all about the right to develop power generating capability. Maybe they should've STARTED with the medical need argument?

And once AGAIN, why do they need to develop power and medical nuclear facilities hundreds of feet underground at every critical site? In a country known for earthquakes? After being offered solutions, not by the evil west, but by the friendly Russians?