Report: Kerry's security proposals accept most Israeli positions

[azurnoir]

4. the end of the article it says that the Palestinians/Arab League have already rejected this proposal

While Israel reportedly sees the proposals as a basis for negotiations, both Abbas and the Arab League have effectively rejected the US plan, stating that here could be not one Israeli soldier in the territory of a future Palestinian state.

Netanyahu has for years been adamant in demanding an Israeli security presence – and not any kind of international force – along the Jordan River following a peace agreement with the Palestinians.

http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Report-Kerrys-security-proposals-accept-most-Israeli-positions-335972

now for the questions given that this 'proposal' has already been rejected why is the rightwing JPost extolling it?

and exactly what role do the West Bank and Jordan Valley settlements play in Israel's 'security', curiously they are not mentioned