Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Thu May 22, 2014, 11:11 AM May 2014

Russia and China veto UN move to refer Syria to international criminal court [View all]

Source: UK Guardian

Russia and China have vetoed a draft UN resolution calling for the crisis in Syria to be referred to the international criminal court – ignoring support for the measure by 65 other countries and all other members of the security council.

Vitaly Churkin, Russia's UN ambassador, had earlier dismissed the vote as a "publicity stunt" and warned that if the resolution had passed it would hinder efforts to end the country's three-year war. However, no peace negotiations are currently taking place.

Thirteen of the security council's 15 members voted for the resolution. Russia and China both cast their vetoes – which are restricted to the five permanent members.

The draft resolution took note of reports by an independent commission appointed by the UN Human Rights Council to investigate violations in Syria. In its latest report last September, the commission said there had been at least eight massacres perpetrated by Assad forces and one by rebels in the previous year and a half. A confidential list of suspected criminals is being produced by the commission and kept by the UN high commissioner for human rights, Navi Pillay.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/22/russia-china-veto-un-draft-resolution-refer-syria-international-criminal-court



Republican senators think they have it good when they can block legislation by filibustering with just 41% of the senators. They would love to go by Security Council rules where you can 'filibuster' something you don't like with 7% (1 out of 15, if you are one of the lucky Big 5) of the vote. 13-2 might win a winning vote in most places but not in the UN.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
russia and china the republicans of the un leftyohiolib May 2014 #1
First they tried a coup then supplied arms to the terrorists cosmicone May 2014 #2
Yep. But, then, the way the West is going ballyhoo May 2014 #7
If "the terrorists are responsible for almost all of the atrocities including the chemical weapons pampango May 2014 #10
Why should the Syrian regime give up sovereignty cosmicone May 2014 #11
Why should war criminals be prosecuted at all? Does the concept of national sovereignty pampango May 2014 #12
Well, the question is, when will we prosecute our own war criminals? bemildred May 2014 #13
Our State Department may be "bloviating". OTOH, I would like to see ALL war criminals pampango May 2014 #14
I'm just saying people have stopped listening to us. bemildred May 2014 #15
we have to lead by example and not hypocrisy cosmicone May 2014 #16
I agree, though I am not in favor of giving war criminals on all sides of conflicts a free pass just pampango May 2014 #17
That's all well and good. christx30 May 2014 #3
China. That's... surprising. KamaAina May 2014 #4
This will continue. dipsydoodle May 2014 #5
Might as well pound sand. nt bemildred May 2014 #6
America regularily ignores and vetos massive support for resolutions regarding Israel's occupation, Fred Sanders May 2014 #8
Precisely. nt Earth_First May 2014 #9
Assad to Moscow: Thank you! bemildred May 2014 #18
At least he is polite. The Russian rep is from the military-industrial complex. pampango May 2014 #19
Yep davidpdx May 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia and China veto UN ...