Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
10. If "the terrorists are responsible for almost all of the atrocities including the chemical weapons
Thu May 22, 2014, 02:55 PM
May 2014

attack", all the more reason to give the ICC jurisdiction over prosecuting those who have committed human rights abuses in Syria. Histirically the ICC has prosecuted perpetrators on all sides who have committed war crimes.

The International Criminal Court (ICC or ICCt) is a permanent international tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression (although jurisdiction for the crime of aggression will not be active until 2017 at the earliest).

Currently, 122 states are states parties to the Statute of the Court, including all of South America and Europe, most of Oceania and roughly half the countries in Africa.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court

Every progressive country in the world is a member of the ICC. That leaves out the US, Russia and China none of which qualify as progressive at any rate. It is these three countries and several smaller authoritarian countries that routinely resist the jurisdiction of the ICC.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

russia and china the republicans of the un leftyohiolib May 2014 #1
First they tried a coup then supplied arms to the terrorists cosmicone May 2014 #2
Yep. But, then, the way the West is going ballyhoo May 2014 #7
If "the terrorists are responsible for almost all of the atrocities including the chemical weapons pampango May 2014 #10
Why should the Syrian regime give up sovereignty cosmicone May 2014 #11
Why should war criminals be prosecuted at all? Does the concept of national sovereignty pampango May 2014 #12
Well, the question is, when will we prosecute our own war criminals? bemildred May 2014 #13
Our State Department may be "bloviating". OTOH, I would like to see ALL war criminals pampango May 2014 #14
I'm just saying people have stopped listening to us. bemildred May 2014 #15
we have to lead by example and not hypocrisy cosmicone May 2014 #16
I agree, though I am not in favor of giving war criminals on all sides of conflicts a free pass just pampango May 2014 #17
That's all well and good. christx30 May 2014 #3
China. That's... surprising. KamaAina May 2014 #4
This will continue. dipsydoodle May 2014 #5
Might as well pound sand. nt bemildred May 2014 #6
America regularily ignores and vetos massive support for resolutions regarding Israel's occupation, Fred Sanders May 2014 #8
Precisely. nt Earth_First May 2014 #9
Assad to Moscow: Thank you! bemildred May 2014 #18
At least he is polite. The Russian rep is from the military-industrial complex. pampango May 2014 #19
Yep davidpdx May 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia and China veto UN ...»Reply #10