Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
18. I agreed, but my point was there was such a program...
Fri Sep 12, 2014, 01:31 PM
Sep 2014

The difference is most of the equipment used during WWII had started out as civilian equipment and then converted for military use, so conversion back was no big deal. This included Trucks, Jeeps, and even planes along with communication equipment (mostly radios and field phones). In addition to ammo originally made for weapons designed for Police and civilians but that the Military adopted as a war necessity (People forget that even POODLES where "drafted" into the K9 corps during WWII for guard dog purposes, you had a shortage of EVERYTHING during WWII and the gap was filled by Civilian Goods).

In Iraq, the situation was different, very little civilian equipment was used and as the guerilla warfare increased, light trucks, which have the most Civilian usage potential, were replaced by armored bomb resistant Trucks (which have limited or no Civilian Usage Potential). After WWII the Army wanted to get rid of the Civilian items for items designed for actual military use, thus the transfer of equipment was mostly giving away mostly barely converted civilian material.

The problem with Iraq what the Army no longer wants is NOT the Humvees or the new 2 1/2 tons trucks the Army manage to obtain while fighting in Iraq, but the special purpose bomb resistant trucks made to operate in an area with a hostile civilian population. These have limited civilian use for the simple reason they were design to operate when the civilian population not only want the operators of those trucks dead, they are doing ACTIVE things to obtain that desire.

As to clothing, after WWII, there was a severe shortage of clothing. Enlistees prior to Vietnam NEVER wore Civilian clothes. They were expected to wear their uniforms at all times. When they were released, they were ordered NEVER to wear those clothes again, but obtain Civilian Wear. The problem was at the end of WWII they was NO civilian Clothes to obtain, so discharged soldiers had to wear they uniforms for months after they were discharged. To address this problem the "Ruptured Duck" was invented. It was a sewed on Eagle that by its designed showed you had been discharged and no longer subject to Military authority even through you were still wearing a uniform.

Now most discharged veterans obtain civilian clothes as soon as they could, but in the post WWII era that could takes weeks and sometimes months. Thus you had men wearing "Military Uniforms" during the post WWII era. On the other hand the police saw no need to adopt such clothing for themselves for it was NOT the fashion to look like you some sort of Special forces to combat crime. Thus police did not wear military uniforms, but civilians did in the post WWII era.

Side note: During WWII if you went into combat you were expected to wear a tie for that was part of your uniform (Most front line soldiers discarded it, but Patton made a big deal of any soldier under his command who did not have a tie on). The uniform may be Green instead of blue but in many ways it was similar to what police officers were wearing. Paratroopers wore uniforms with large cargo pockets on their legs, like modern Battle Dress Uniforms, but regular soldiers did not. Thus post WWII Police wore a uniform much like what WWII soldiers had worn, right down to the tie (or open collar button).

About 1980 the US Army adopted its Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) and SWAT teams and other Police started to dress up in them. You can say this is new, but if you remember what the WWII Uniform was, the Police did the same thing during that time period, except they kept the uniform blue.

As to the tie and the uniform during WWII, it even made the cartoon in Stars and Stripes. One of the running lines during WWII was soldiers "Behind the front lines enough NOT to get shot at, but close enough to get away without wearing a tie". Yes ties were part of the WWII uniform even when soldiers went into combat. Most soldiers ignored that requirement but ever so often someone tried to enforce it.

http://www.awon.org/willie/willie2.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OMG. What the f-ck is up in this Country? Something BAD is brewing... blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #1
Money for this but not education. F@ck militarization grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #2
Obama billhicks76 Sep 2014 #24
That shiny new paint makes it look so much less deadly. obxhead Sep 2014 #3
The US military won't use MRAPs on military bases. Half-Century Man Sep 2014 #4
Well once the school kids started planting landmines all over what did you expect. Exultant Democracy Sep 2014 #5
+100 christx30 Sep 2014 #12
I'll say it again, we didn't give all the war junk to the cops after WWII. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #6
Yup... we sold it to civilians who opened whistler162 Sep 2014 #8
There was a "swords into plowshares" glee at going to a peacetime standing.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #14
Yes, we did. happyslug Sep 2014 #15
50's era cops weren't dressing up as soldiers and driving tanks.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #17
I agreed, but my point was there was such a program... happyslug Sep 2014 #18
There's a movie you have to check out if you haven't seen it yet called "The Pentagon Wars". Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #19
I saw it when it first came out.... happyslug Sep 2014 #20
The moral of the movie for me was promotions are linked to contracts... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #25
Yes, but wait! It's to save children!!! NBachers Sep 2014 #7
MDVs! RandiFan1290 Sep 2014 #9
Way too many guns, we need more butter. Snarkoleptic Sep 2014 #10
Precisely Sherman A1 Sep 2014 #11
Unreal... blackspade Sep 2014 #13
won't somebody think of the children? frylock Sep 2014 #16
So is that the workaround to impunity on military grade vehicles for law enforcement work? Earth_First Sep 2014 #21
This screams "Find a quick big-ticket purchase..." Blue_Tires Sep 2014 #22
The "after" images are photoshopped bananas Sep 2014 #23
Haven't studied this enough to delete_bush Sep 2014 #27
Aren't these the same geniuses procon Sep 2014 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tanks at the school gates...»Reply #18