Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
8. If the people voted to change direction, might that not include acceptance of Keystone?
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 02:13 PM
Nov 2014

Perhaps it's time the people who blow off midterm elections see what can happen when you sit on the sidelines.


New High: 61% Favor Building the Keystone XL Pipeline
Wednesday, April 23, 2014


Support for building the Keystone XL pipeline is now at its highest level ever.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 61% of Likely U.S. Voters now at least somewhat favor building the major oil pipeline from Canada to Texas, while just 27% are opposed. This includes 37% who Strongly Favor the project and 10% who Strongly Oppose it. Thirteen percent (13%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Support for building the pipeline is up four points from 57% in January and now has edged above the previous high of 60% found in November 2011 when President Obama first delayed the project for further environmental study.

Sixty-two percent (62%) believe it will be good for the U.S. economy if the pipeline is built. That’s up from 56% at the beginning of the year and also a new high. Unchanged are the 10% who think the pipeline will be bad for the economy. Twelve percent (12%) say it will have no impact, while 16% are not sure.


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/april_2014/new_high_61_favor_building_the_keystone_xl_pipeline

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GOP has votes to pass Keystone [View all] philosslayer Nov 2014 OP
so kiss the Human species goodbye! RoccoR5955 Nov 2014 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #12
good question libmom74 Nov 2014 #14
I wouldn't mind if it was just humans Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #21
Yep! NCarolinawoman Nov 2014 #32
Spot on! City Lights Nov 2014 #40
I've felt this way all my life - cilla4progress Nov 2014 #77
The Keystone pipeline will be the end of the human race? former9thward Nov 2014 #41
You simply do not understand the implications of RoccoR5955 Nov 2014 #55
I guess you are unaware of reality. former9thward Nov 2014 #59
I am aware of reality as you state it RoccoR5955 Nov 2014 #60
Not "going to move it", it IS being moved. former9thward Nov 2014 #62
Then why bother with a pipeline? daleo Nov 2014 #69
It is more efficient. former9thward Nov 2014 #76
"economical"? hopemountain Nov 2014 #88
Well, I'm pretty sure none of us are oil drillers Recursion Nov 2014 #99
"The trees on this planet provide much of the oxygen" rock Nov 2014 #63
They took all the trees and put 'em in a tree museum Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #73
You for the moment have pi posts! rock Nov 2014 #75
Trees? yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #78
not if the water and the air are poisoned first. nt hopemountain Nov 2014 #89
Well you have a point there yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #91
and if the drought continues ... hopemountain Nov 2014 #92
And you think it won't get cleared for oil if the pipeline isn't built? (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #98
The hyperventilators said the same thing about the WestSeattle2 Nov 2014 #64
Do you honestly believe they're going to reforest this vast man-made disaster area? Art_from_Ark Nov 2014 #68
Blocking the xl pipeline wont fix that mess. DCBob Nov 2014 #95
But building a 2,000-mile pipeline to carry that crap is asking for trouble, Art_from_Ark Nov 2014 #102
Don't you know AnalystInParadise Nov 2014 #84
The mega rich will climb on a virgin space vehicle of some sort workinclasszero Nov 2014 #54
Wasn't this the plot of Elysium? Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #71
Wow you are pretty much right..now I got to see that film workinclasszero Nov 2014 #82
And TPP, and the Grand Bargain... KamaAina Nov 2014 #2
The GOP says thousand of new jobs, but the facts don't show where more then 100 jobs. sammy750 Nov 2014 #3
On the contrary. Evidence suggest that Keystone may result in a net LOSS of jobs RufusTFirefly Nov 2014 #16
It will be thousands of construction project jobs madville Nov 2014 #103
Oh my, whatever will Sen. Cotton do! He'll vote for Keystone and then vote sinkingfeeling Nov 2014 #4
Maybe but not enough to override a veto. The real question is will Obama veto? PSPS Nov 2014 #5
If the people voted to change direction, might that not include acceptance of Keystone? Tarheel_Dem Nov 2014 #8
i take that as a "No" n/t Enrique Nov 2014 #10
If the POTUS is interested in what the American people say they want, then Keystone it is. Tarheel_Dem Nov 2014 #13
no, sometimes presidents show leadership Enrique Nov 2014 #19
So, in some cases, when the POTUS goes with public opinion, and let's be clear, there's no greater.. Tarheel_Dem Nov 2014 #25
Opinion polls? You know what opinions are like right? Darb Nov 2014 #42
Is there another scientific way to gauge public opinion, or is yours the only one that matters? Tarheel_Dem Nov 2014 #46
There's always science itself. Ever thought of that? Darb Nov 2014 #85
my gut tells me that stat of 62% is wishful hopemountain Nov 2014 #90
Not a chance. truebrit71 Nov 2014 #9
Will Obama veto Keystone XL? NickB79 Nov 2014 #26
I'd say he doesnt 7962 Nov 2014 #29
It depends MurryMom Nov 2014 #57
No way in hell. ballyhoo Nov 2014 #33
I don't know if Canada is even going to go for it anymore sharp_stick Nov 2014 #6
There is still the one problem Samantha Nov 2014 #7
He'll approve it to save face Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #18
I don't think Obama is the type of person who would allow himself to be blackmailed Samantha Nov 2014 #31
When the pipe line causes damage malletgirl02 Nov 2014 #97
Which Dems? We need to flood their offices with emails, letters and phone calls. Publicly shame them Dont call me Shirley Nov 2014 #11
I'm confused. Isn't taking somebodies property by gov't for a private company "Big Gov't" hollowdweller Nov 2014 #15
Let's hope they take a bunch of teabaggers property Betty Nov 2014 #17
It's only worthy of ire if the black guy doesn't like it. Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #20
I hereby rename the project Kidney Stone KamaAina Nov 2014 #22
Keystone is going to happen. It always was. There's no further obstacles now. TwilightGardener Nov 2014 #23
Keystone was not opposed strongly by Democrats. nm rhett o rick Nov 2014 #24
folks they are already using that oil, it's being shipped to the okieinpain Nov 2014 #27
Actually, the stuff that is produced by the "oil" from Keystone is not destined to be gasoline ever. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2014 #37
yes, but it is being shipped on our roads to our refineries through okieinpain Nov 2014 #39
Sucky, but the least of my concerns right now about this elections' outcome ... brett_jv Nov 2014 #28
That is kind of selfish. RoccoR5955 Nov 2014 #56
They do not have the votes necessarily kansasobama Nov 2014 #30
I guess we can say goodbuy to cheap gasoline here in Fargo. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #34
Gas prices rising MurryMom Nov 2014 #58
It's GAME OVER for the environment. Runaway temperatures and flooding, and droughts and pestilence. blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #35
They really are trying to bring about the "end times" Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #72
Hammer hits nail, Darb Nov 2014 #86
Something new ? father founding Nov 2014 #36
57 + 3 = 60 davidpdx Nov 2014 #38
67 needed actually, which they don't have. Darb Nov 2014 #44
With Repubs taking control next year, can't they just vote to change the rule to a simple majority? Tarheel_Dem Nov 2014 #48
They could vote to end debate at 50 votes instead of 60, Darb Nov 2014 #50
Ok I see what you are saying, to override davidpdx Nov 2014 #70
The Alberta Tar Sands Excavation is........... Darb Nov 2014 #43
OK, but stopping the pipeline doesn't fix that Recursion Nov 2014 #100
For many A Job, is better than No Job. One_Life_To_Give Nov 2014 #45
What are the two evils that they are choosing from? Darb Nov 2014 #47
Unemployed Constituants One_Life_To_Give Nov 2014 #61
Last month 250K jobs were created, KXL would create 10k temporary jobs, Darb Nov 2014 #66
"would you like fries with that" Vs Construction One_Life_To_Give Nov 2014 #74
Look, if you think that those pipeline jobs are gonna explode the job market, Darb Nov 2014 #83
That didn't stop them from shipping our jobs overseas. eom RiverLover Nov 2014 #93
Gas prices under $3 a gallon need a XL Pipe for water not gas. polynomial Nov 2014 #49
It didn't even need to be veto-proof. Jackpine Radical Nov 2014 #51
What Dems will they peel off? vi5 Nov 2014 #52
Senate Dem's can filibuster, and Pres Obama has the power to veto. c588415 Nov 2014 #53
veto that sucker flamingdem Nov 2014 #65
whats the downside? quadrature Nov 2014 #67
Unlocks a vast reservoir of CO2, even more so than at present daleo Nov 2014 #79
Wow. Please allow me Darb Nov 2014 #87
Expect Bill McKibben to be arrested again...I'm thinking I should be with him. So should we all. nt adigal Nov 2014 #80
I feel bad for the young people who did get out and vote to try and prevent shite like this.. it's Cha Nov 2014 #81
How many of those who didn't vote.. KinMd Nov 2014 #96
Obama has vote to defeat it. nt kelliekat44 Nov 2014 #94
GOP Approving Pipeline Removes Albatross from Democrat's Neck eringer Nov 2014 #101
Isn't the pipeline still tied up in more local battles? Vinca Nov 2014 #104
Canada shale oil to Texas refineries & export to China. The 'State' govs allow the pipeline. Sunlei Nov 2014 #105
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP has votes to pass Key...»Reply #8