Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
56. Live free or Diebold!
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:40 PM
Dec 2014
The ghosts of 2004 election irregularities

Diebold was at the center of Ohio’s 2004 election debacle, much of this captured in an article by Free Press Senior Editor Harvey Wasserman and this author, entitled, “Diebold’s Political Machine.” Walden "Wally" O'Dell, chairman of the board and chief executive of Diebold, was a long-time funder of Republican candidates. In September 2003, he held a packed $1,000-per-head GOP fundraiser at his 10,800-square-foot mansion Cotswold Manor in Upper Arlington, Ohio. He was feted as a guest at then-President George W. Bush's Texas ranch, joining a cadre of “Pioneers and Rangers” who pledged to raise more than $100,000 for the Bush reelection campaign.

Most memorably, in 2003 O'Dell penned a letter pledging his commitment “to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the President.” O'Dell defended his actions, telling the Cleveland Plain Dealer “I'm not doing anything wrong or complicated.” But he also promised to lower his political profile and “try to be more sensitive.” But the Diebold boss' partisan cards were squarely on the table.

Prior to the 2004 election, Blackwell tried to award a $100 million unbid contract to Diebold for electronic voting machines. A storm of public outrage and a series of lawsuits forced him to cancel the deal. But a substantial percentage of Ohio's 2004 votes were counted by Diebold software and Diebold Opti-scan machines which frequently malfunctioned in the Democratic stronghold of Toledo. It was revealed in 2006 that Blackwell owned Diebold stock.

Diebold's GEMS election software was used in about half of Ohio counties in the 2004 election. Because of Blackwell's effort, 41 counties also used Diebold machines in Ohio's highly dubious 2005 election.

Also in the Ohio 2004 election, a whistleblower leaked documents revealing that Diebold had allegedly used illegal, uncertified hardware and software during California election.

http://columbusfreepress.com/article/diebold-indicted-its-spectre-still-haunts-ohio-elections


Yep..."we'll get whoever the vote 'tabulators' want."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3/4 want someone else. Dawson Leery Dec 2014 #1
"Someone else" is always the frontrunner oberliner Dec 2014 #57
He'll be the next President Auggie Dec 2014 #2
I've had enough Bushies to last about 5 lifetimes big_dog Dec 2014 #4
So have I. They'll lie, cheat, steal and spend their way to victory. The 1% wants it so badly. Auggie Dec 2014 #5
We'll get whoever the vote "tabulators" want. blkmusclmachine Dec 2014 #9
Live free or Diebold! KansDem Dec 2014 #56
Nope. The right WILL NOT vote for him. 7962 Dec 2014 #11
Scary thought lobodons Dec 2014 #12
I dont think moderates would vote for Cruz nt 7962 Dec 2014 #22
wingnuts will probably ask for Scott Walker type on the ticket so they wont stay home in Nov 2016 big_dog Dec 2014 #13
I think they will when lied to Auggie Dec 2014 #15
They will vote, overwhelmingly for him... SoapBox Dec 2014 #20
Go visit a few of the right wing websites; 7962 Dec 2014 #21
so what? reddread Dec 2014 #28
Bush/Clinton wont be as close as Bush/Gore was, IMO. nt 7962 Dec 2014 #30
Close doesn't matter when your side programs the central tabulators to win an election. loudsue Dec 2014 #33
If that was the case we wouldnt have two-term Pres Obama! 7962 Dec 2014 #34
was there a Bush running? you think they want someone else in their way? reddread Dec 2014 #36
And the left WILL NOT vote for Clinton Reter Dec 2014 #38
Using DU as a barometer, most WILL vote for her 7962 Dec 2014 #44
self selected, or whinnied down liberal participants arent the swing block reddread Dec 2014 #54
the real swing bloc is EXACTLY who we NEED. reddread Dec 2014 #55
"better call a cartage firm" .. now THATS funny stuff 7962 Dec 2014 #62
Hillary Clinton beats every Republican contender by a good margin. NYC Liberal Dec 2014 #63
In other words DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #3
What happened to mittens? louis-t Dec 2014 #6
the CNN/ORC polling firm got Mittens big_dog Dec 2014 #10
He lost, like most mittens I had as a kid. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2014 #19
I'm actively exploring not voting for Jeb. nt postulater Dec 2014 #7
Of course he is..republicans are sheep. Dawgs Dec 2014 #8
Remember who our front-runner is Reter Dec 2014 #39
Not really. Rand Paul could announce next week and he would be the front-runner. Dawgs Dec 2014 #46
one of these things is not like the other reddread Dec 2014 #50
What? n/t Dawgs Dec 2014 #52
exactly reddread Dec 2014 #53
.. Dawgs Dec 2014 #59
Not saying much chickenfairy Dec 2014 #14
Hillary will beat him handily. n/t cosmicone Dec 2014 #16
+10 (nt) reACTIONary Dec 2014 #31
Sure, he is the only "sane" one on the list. femmocrat Dec 2014 #17
More murky sleaziness from a GOP candidate (see L.A. Times article) C Moon Dec 2014 #18
It has been shown that a Bush can occupy ... kacekwl Dec 2014 #23
No. 7 on most unpopular with conservative websites jakeXT Dec 2014 #24
How quaint! Bush vs Clinton just for old times sake! Nihil Dec 2014 #25
Somebody wake me up from this lifelong Bush nightmare. Jamastiene Dec 2014 #26
Jeb is deep Inner Party GOP, so if he wants the nomination, he'll get it. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #27
Polls mean nothing at this point Bjorn Against Dec 2014 #29
+1 Dawson Leery Dec 2014 #35
The first or latest cliwn out of the car garners notice, but the rubes are fickle. n/t Orsino Dec 2014 #64
I've been saying this on DU ever since bush the chimp was president. loudsue Dec 2014 #32
Our paper did a poll last week "Who would you vote for if it was a Bush doc03 Dec 2014 #37
Yup... SoapBox Dec 2014 #41
Like I said a few weeks ago... Gumboot Dec 2014 #40
Although it is still early, I loath the possibility that it will be Clinton vs. Bush davidpdx Dec 2014 #42
If you want to beat him... roamer65 Dec 2014 #43
The Republican Party admires SamKnause Dec 2014 #45
Can someone explain to me how the hell Christie is still in the top tier bigdarryl Dec 2014 #47
Dynasty. Feral Child Dec 2014 #48
MORONS! Elmer S. E. Dump Dec 2014 #49
This is the easy part, Jeb. oldandhappy Dec 2014 #51
Our biggest negative is having the White House 8 years yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #58
I don't think that Jebby is LibertyLover Dec 2014 #60
supported by hypocrites? reddread Dec 2014 #61
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeb Bush Clear Front-Runn...»Reply #56