Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
4. Giant missing hole in this article:
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 03:12 PM
Jun 2015

The Senate bill funds TAA by cutting Medicare.

If TAA passed, every Democratic representative that voted "Yes" on TAA would see this ad in their district: "Representative _____ voted to steal money from sick elderly people and give it to lazy moochers".

This wasn't just about the TPA and TPP. It was also about rejecting the poison pill Senate Republicans put in the TAA in order to fuck over Democrats who vote for TAA.

The "plan" from Obama and company was to pass yet another bill that undid the Medicare cuts. First, that bill may not pass. And boondoggles like the sequester demonstrate these kinds of fixes can't be guaranteed by the leadership. Second, even if it did pass, the explanation about why that ad is technically true but overall inaccurate doesn't fit well in an opposing TV ad.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Vox: House Democrats just...»Reply #4