Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)

31. Typo corrected!

Reply to yallerdawg (Reply #30)

Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:18 AM

Jul 2017

I think now you will see that I am indeed agreeing with you, and was explaining what the questioner was trying to get you to confirm.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jul 2017 OP

Every decision she made was put under a microscope during the primaries ismnotwasm Jul 2017 #1

And they love themselves some hawkishness forgotmylogin Jul 2017 #26

nonsense. drray23 Jul 2017 #2

Republicans were going to criticize and hate her in any case. yurbud Jul 2017 #15

Not just republicans. A certain segment of the left, or so-called left, were too. KitSileya Jul 2017 #19

+1000 (nt) ehrnst Jul 2017 #22

That is pure BS. She got three million more votes than Dump. Our system gave Dump the presidency demosincebirth Jul 2017 #3

Yes! DavidDvorkin Jul 2017 #4

work with the things you can control. Dems should have been a hell of a lot more aggressive yurbud Jul 2017 #7

Dems should have been SO much more aggressive in telling SCOTUS not to gut the voter rights act ehrnst Jul 2017 #33

it doesn't hurt to figure out what she "won" because of and "in spite of" yurbud Jul 2017 #9

Doesn't hurt to look at a variety of journalistic sources for studies on that ehrnst Jul 2017 #37

That's what this means." Igel Jul 2017 #11

thank-you still_one Jul 2017 #20

It's been pretty much shown that she would have taken the White House had ehrnst Jul 2017 #5

she could have widened the gap to make it unstealable yurbud Jul 2017 #6

But of course. ehrnst Jul 2017 #8

Putin & every other leader doesn't give a rat's ass about our domestic policy--Hillary was a threat yurbud Jul 2017 #16

Um... I was replying to your post about why she was a good candidate despite the sliver of votes in ehrnst Jul 2017 #21

You mentioned her keeping Putin up at night. yurbud Jul 2017 #23

Yes, which was a reason that the Kremlin tried so hard to scuttle her getting to the White House. ehrnst Jul 2017 #27

I'm a staunch, die-hard Hillary supporter... yallerdawg Jul 2017 #18

It made you doubt Hillary? I was not a fan of hers, but that whole email business had zero impact yurbud Jul 2017 #24

What Comey announced, out of the blue, 11 days before the election? yallerdawg Jul 2017 #28

I believe that you are being asked to confirm that there was ehrnst Jul 2017 #29

While proven wrong and disgustingly reprehensible now... yallerdawg Jul 2017 #30

Typo corrected! ehrnst Jul 2017 #31

I do! yallerdawg Jul 2017 #32

ERMEGERD! ehrnst Jul 2017 #34

*YAWN* Today's "X - cost Hillary the election" shitfest. Aristus Jul 2017 #10

+ a million or so! eom BlueMTexpat Jul 2017 #12

BS. Some combo of Stupid /non engaged/ racist fucks cost her the the election. Le Gaucher Jul 2017 #14

You know, it takes a lot of I don't know what to call someone too hawkish when Trump Solly Mack Jul 2017 #13

Total b.s. brer cat Jul 2017 #17

I don't trust anything Trump says about anything. But people who take candidates at their word yurbud Jul 2017 #35

A friend of my husband voted for chump because a Russian friend of his said Hillary wanted wars kimbutgar Jul 2017 #25

Now I've Heard It All (Until Tomorrow And Another Anti-Hillary Thread Pops Up) Me. Jul 2017 #36

Christ on a cracker. Is there no end to our own willingness to cut off our own legs? This is Squinch Jul 2017 #38