Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Black Flag or Bull! [View all]RC
(25,592 posts)17. Yeah, why is that?
Many of the so-called discrepancies are easily proved to be true. The government's version is full of
, but if you don't go along with the official version, the one that the neo-con war mongers told us, tying 9/11 and Iraq together, you're certifiable. There is dissonance aplenty with those that insist the government's version is somehow the correct one. They have been trying to silence those of us that have it figured out, since day one. They can't because there are way too many discrepancies in their explanations. Even those concerning what we've been told about bin Laden.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When someone says 'ALMOST 2000' like it's a relevant point, it's important to fix it in context.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#46
Putin's just trollin' us. No worries. Fair play with Radio Free Europe broadcasting bullshit
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#26
Is the field that equal though? Putin regularly kills or imprisons his opposition.
inch4progress
Sep 2013
#39
Bush version ties 9/11 & Iraq together. Reality is different but does not require a black flag op.
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 2013
#24
Yes, of course I knew Bin Laden received funding from the Reagan administration.
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 2013
#74
Because you don't know enough about the particulars of using a lightweight steel ....
marble falls
Sep 2013
#22
I fully expect this to be moved, but not before I recognize a thing or two...
MrMickeysMom
Sep 2013
#7
Believing it was Saudi's, believing the HUGE AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE, makes us sheep?
inch4progress
Sep 2013
#12
Gov story??? What? The evidence provided the explanation, not the government.
inch4progress
Sep 2013
#56
What about Maddow and others on MSNBC? I never liked CNN, and Obviously not Fox.
inch4progress
Sep 2013
#69
And each of those Alcoa exterior panels that was carried inside by the impacts was
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#47
Those 'lying eyes' cannot differentiate between molten steel and molten copper or other metals
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#76
RT does produce some excellent documentaries as all who watch it will know.
dipsydoodle
Sep 2013
#38
IF there was a conspiracy to collapse the towers from within, by the US government
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#78