Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
33. When guys do it, it's more of a "dork dance", but the video was "girls". As for "toning it down"...
Wed May 9, 2012, 09:47 AM
May 2012

That wasn't at all what I was implying - it is simply a matter of their age and encouraging them to dress and act like that. Adult women can do whatever they want, but pushing sexually suggestive behavior on young kids (either sex) is asking for trouble. My wife's classroom has one of those "Wii dance" programs (for PE purposes) and she's freaked out by some of the moves the kindergarteners use (the guys in particular with their crotch grab pelvic thrusts - dudes, it's still there, you don't have to check) and she's ANYTHING but a "prude".

In sharp contrast, we don't watch TV and raised three daughters (youngest is 17 now). They all dress rather conservatively of their own choice. They love the 2nd hand stores because they can find styles that are unusual (and they each have their own tastes). I'm glad they never bought into the notion that they have to look or act like a sex object and they are all self-confident young women. If there's a romantic situation where the look would fit, they're all perfectly capable of achieving it, but it isn't a "can't leave the house yet" daily issue.

I totally reject the "she was asking for it" argument to justify rape based on the way a woman is dressed, but children (both sexes) that imitate adult sexuality are pedophile bait and parents that promote it need a good slap upside the head to wake them up. Let them be children while they still can be. They'll be adults all too soon.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good lord! cyberswede May 2012 #1
I remember that video WhoIsNumberNone May 2012 #2
Heartbreaking! LASlibinSC May 2012 #3
I agree it is heartbreaking. redqueen May 2012 #5
It does, and it has for a very long time. PDJane May 2012 #38
That's just grotesque! Speck Tater May 2012 #4
I suppose part of it is just capitalism. redqueen May 2012 #6
I just don't get it. Speck Tater May 2012 #9
Some really good points buried under a lot of moralistic and prudish conservatism... DutchLiberal May 2012 #7
Couldn't have possibly said it better myself. AverageJoe90 May 2012 #10
What?! Somebody actually read all 3 pages worth of arguments I wrote? DutchLiberal May 2012 #11
I did.. SemperEadem May 2012 #13
Wow, great points, but I should ask, would this be an accurate shorter statement? alp227 May 2012 #14
I think you miss the point .... DaDeacon May 2012 #18
Thanks, and you got it almost all right! DutchLiberal May 2012 #20
You think that's my position? Or you mean that's the position I'm criticizing? DutchLiberal May 2012 #19
The position you were criticizing. alp227 May 2012 #21
I agree there is some overreaction. However, MadrasT May 2012 #25
I don't disagree with the premise of the video entirely. DutchLiberal May 2012 #28
Capitalism and corporate LASlibinSC May 2012 #8
part of the problem SemperEadem May 2012 #15
IMO there is more to it than lazy parenting. redqueen May 2012 #16
I recall very vividly at age 11 going through it SemperEadem May 2012 #17
we do not have a tv Tumbulu May 2012 #27
If Fijians were cut off from television SemperEadem May 2012 #12
i think the video is pretty clear, and parents, especially with daughters can easily seabeyond May 2012 #22
"Fashion" magazines are the Worst Sarcasticus May 2012 #23
Perhaps that's how it started? redqueen May 2012 #24
No, some people are trying to ignore and reject biology because it doesn't fit their narrative. DutchLiberal May 2012 #29
Now I'm REALLY glad we don't watch TV. E-FUCKING-GADS! That's just so wrong. HopeHoops May 2012 #26
Yes, the dolls were particularly bad. DutchLiberal May 2012 #30
The "slut dance" contest at the beginning was rather disturbing too. HopeHoops May 2012 #31
The "slut dance" is problematic for more than one reason. DutchLiberal May 2012 #32
When guys do it, it's more of a "dork dance", but the video was "girls". As for "toning it down"... HopeHoops May 2012 #33
I couldn't agree more. DutchLiberal May 2012 #34
It's also the movements, looks, and attitudes. I'm not for FCC censorship, but parents? HopeHoops May 2012 #35
'Sex sells', but we've known that for a long time and honestly, I don't see anything wrong with it.. DutchLiberal May 2012 #36
Yeah, it is really stupid. But you hit another point - Gray Poupon? HopeHoops May 2012 #37
Kick Sarcasticus May 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»On the Sexualization of Y...»Reply #33