Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DutchLiberal

(5,744 posts)
34. I couldn't agree more.
Wed May 9, 2012, 10:00 AM
May 2012
As for "toning it down"... That wasn't at all what I was implying

I know you weren't; that's why I said "some people", referring to others.

I agree that pre-pubescent children should not be made to look and act in a sexual way. They're children, there's nothing sexual about them! Nobody is a 'prude' for pointing that out. That's just good common sense!

I'm sure you agree that there is a world of variety between 'dressing conservatively' and 'dressing like a sex object'; that there is a lot of grey between those two black and white polars opposites.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good lord! cyberswede May 2012 #1
I remember that video WhoIsNumberNone May 2012 #2
Heartbreaking! LASlibinSC May 2012 #3
I agree it is heartbreaking. redqueen May 2012 #5
It does, and it has for a very long time. PDJane May 2012 #38
That's just grotesque! Speck Tater May 2012 #4
I suppose part of it is just capitalism. redqueen May 2012 #6
I just don't get it. Speck Tater May 2012 #9
Some really good points buried under a lot of moralistic and prudish conservatism... DutchLiberal May 2012 #7
Couldn't have possibly said it better myself. AverageJoe90 May 2012 #10
What?! Somebody actually read all 3 pages worth of arguments I wrote? DutchLiberal May 2012 #11
I did.. SemperEadem May 2012 #13
Wow, great points, but I should ask, would this be an accurate shorter statement? alp227 May 2012 #14
I think you miss the point .... DaDeacon May 2012 #18
Thanks, and you got it almost all right! DutchLiberal May 2012 #20
You think that's my position? Or you mean that's the position I'm criticizing? DutchLiberal May 2012 #19
The position you were criticizing. alp227 May 2012 #21
I agree there is some overreaction. However, MadrasT May 2012 #25
I don't disagree with the premise of the video entirely. DutchLiberal May 2012 #28
Capitalism and corporate LASlibinSC May 2012 #8
part of the problem SemperEadem May 2012 #15
IMO there is more to it than lazy parenting. redqueen May 2012 #16
I recall very vividly at age 11 going through it SemperEadem May 2012 #17
we do not have a tv Tumbulu May 2012 #27
If Fijians were cut off from television SemperEadem May 2012 #12
i think the video is pretty clear, and parents, especially with daughters can easily seabeyond May 2012 #22
"Fashion" magazines are the Worst Sarcasticus May 2012 #23
Perhaps that's how it started? redqueen May 2012 #24
No, some people are trying to ignore and reject biology because it doesn't fit their narrative. DutchLiberal May 2012 #29
Now I'm REALLY glad we don't watch TV. E-FUCKING-GADS! That's just so wrong. HopeHoops May 2012 #26
Yes, the dolls were particularly bad. DutchLiberal May 2012 #30
The "slut dance" contest at the beginning was rather disturbing too. HopeHoops May 2012 #31
The "slut dance" is problematic for more than one reason. DutchLiberal May 2012 #32
When guys do it, it's more of a "dork dance", but the video was "girls". As for "toning it down"... HopeHoops May 2012 #33
I couldn't agree more. DutchLiberal May 2012 #34
It's also the movements, looks, and attitudes. I'm not for FCC censorship, but parents? HopeHoops May 2012 #35
'Sex sells', but we've known that for a long time and honestly, I don't see anything wrong with it.. DutchLiberal May 2012 #36
Yeah, it is really stupid. But you hit another point - Gray Poupon? HopeHoops May 2012 #37
Kick Sarcasticus May 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»On the Sexualization of Y...»Reply #34