Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Showing Original Post only (View all)OOPS! Willard Romney: We Don’t Need ‘More FIREMEN, More POLICEMEN, More TEACHERS’ [View all]
" When Republicans attack public workers, they often take care to exempt cops and firefighters, because they are culturally sympathetic figures, and muddle the message that government workers are parasites who are destroying the economic conditions of ordinary Americans.
But today Mitt Romney got a good deal more specific, claiming we do not need to hire more cops or firefighters specifically, which would, he said, cut against the interests of the American people. He also specificallly named teachers.
Romney made the comments in response to Obamas presser today, at which the president claimed the private sector is doing fine. Per CNN:
Romney said of Obama, he wants another stimulus, he wants to hire more government workers. He says we need more fireman, more policeman, more teachers. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. Its time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.
Its hard to argue that the message from Wisconsin was that Americans dont think we should hire more firefighters and cops. They were exempted from Scott Walkers crackdown on public employee bargaining rights, which enabled him to divide and conquer labor.
But beyond that, this could resonate in the presidential race: It will allow the White House to reframe the debate over public sector workers and job creation on more favorable terms.
- This time, however, Romney deserves points for honesty: He has forthrightly declared that the class of government workers holding back other Americans does include cops, firefighters and teachers. And in so doing, he has singlehandedly reframed the debate from one over despised government bureaucrats to one over whether we should hire more cops, firefighters and teachers to get the economy going. This is a debate the White House will be happy to have.
cont'
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/mitt-romney-we-dont-need-more-cops-firefighters-or-teachers/2012/06/08/gJQAvOgDOV_blog.html
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OOPS! Willard Romney: We Don’t Need ‘More FIREMEN, More POLICEMEN, More TEACHERS’ [View all]
Segami
Jun 2012
OP
No, we don't. We can let creeps like Romney dress up as cops and go on patrol for free. THAT
Nay
Jun 2012
#3
Same set of the mouth and jaw, same look in the eyes, same slight squint of the eyebrows.
colorado_ufo
Jun 2012
#29
They don't have to ask. They know just what percentage of the unemployed are teachers
L. Coyote
Jun 2012
#35
The 53% win in WI was about not overturning a previous election, NOT a hatred of cops and firemen.
RBInMaine
Jun 2012
#22
Haha! And why was his dad a governor? And why was he a wannabe cop? You got something there!
freshwest
Jun 2012
#37
Suddenly, everyone constituting the government is what, Russian or something?
L. Coyote
Jun 2012
#32
Breaking: Rmoney demands the dissolution of Congress because they are government workers.
BumRushDaShow
Jun 2012
#41
"It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.” ELABORATE, CLARIFY
LaPera
Jun 2012
#45
After they fire the cops and firefighters who will respond when the enemy is at their gates?
olegramps
Jun 2012
#49