The reason that Hillary is skittish about having a debate in New York.

[Uncle Joe]

103. The advisers arguing against the intervention in Libya were using foresight, not hindsight,

Isis got a foothold there as a result.

The same held true with Iraq.

Honduras was different, in that case a democratically elected President was overthrown by the military, kicked out of his house only wearing pajamas, it was an obvious "military coup."

The rest of the world condemned it as such, but Hillary worked behind the scenes to enable it.

The result being, Honduras descended into chaos with corruption and violence rampant.

In all three cases, Iraq, Libya and Honduras, Hillary supported policies that in two cases helped to empower Isis while in the case of Honduras created extreme violence and oppression leading to a humanitarian crisis which in turn sent children risking their lives to flee across our border and Hillary's answer was to send them back.

In the case of Syria, Hillary was willing to risk an even wider war and U.S. involvement by proposing a "no fly zone" which would've brought us into direct conflict with Russia or cost our nation credibility with our allies by not enforcing it.

I'm convinced that Hillary's judgment is highly suspect and will only serve to destabilize the world whether using foresight or hindsight.

On top of that her hair trigger policies in regards to regime change or war, combined with Hillary's support of fracking for one will only exacerbate anthropological climate change, as the world's climate circumstances become ever more dire as a result, the prospects of nations fighting over dwindling resources and major war increase exponentially.