Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
15. Are you saying it is used negatively by other people of color?
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:35 PM
May 2016

Or are you saying some white guy out there is using it as a disparaging term? Because if it is the second, then that is laughable, it is like a grandmother using the word fleek...it just doesn't work. If you want proof look at the youtube comments below the video, you will find a tone of racists people posting about the "N" word, and they always use the "er" in the posts because they think it is the same, or try with and "a" and then move to an "er". It is all about context...and what Larry did was to show the audience that Obama was a part of society that had been long treated poorly by them. It was basically rubbing in their faces, no matter how you thought he did as president, he did that much better because he had to deal with racism from the start of his campaign from his running mates all the way to now with the congress and the senate that have gone out of their way to make him one term or failed. It was showing no matter what Larry may have said negative about him in the speech, he still was proud of him and was in awe of everything he did. For us to cast doubt on the usage of the word is for us to censor him and his message.

If you want additional proof, notice you only spelled one version of the word, but not the other...there is a reason for that.


Also you can read this article on it as well...

That last word seemed to sway uncomfortably over a room mostly filled with white journalists acutely accustomed to staying within the fine lines of political correctness. But it was an important moment in American history, even if it made many people (both black and white) cringe. At its most pure, this was an example of "code-switching" for both Barack Obama and Wilmore, upper-middle-class African American men who, despite their mainstream success, identify with the broader black culture and speak its language.

Obama's response—pumping his chest in solidarity before rising to hug and thank him—was actually far more significant than Wilmore's words, and explains, in part, why he and his wife Michelle are so beloved: They are widely seen as a man and woman of their community who have not lost track of their roots.

...for a brief moment, what we witnessed Saturday night were two black men who did not care that white people were present.


The mainstream media and Twitter-verse responses were, of course, visceral and speedy: Had Wilmore gone too far? Was it disrespectful? Or did the comedian's race offer him a kind of immunity?

But for many African American men, it may have been the most natural thing in the world: Reflecting the tacit signs of respect given to one another everywhere from the barbershop to the boardroom.



During the 2008 election cycle, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was caught on tape saying that Mr. Obama spoke "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one." Former President George W. Bush and incumbent Vice President Joe Biden both referred to Senator Obama as being "articulate." (The latter famously also used the word "clean.&quot


What their statements reflect is an ignorant but mostly benign prejudice that plagues many white conservatives and liberals alike: They implicitly expect middle- and upper-middle-class black Americans to mirror their own linguistic norms.


Yet for a brief moment, what we witnessed Saturday night were two black men who did not care that white people were present. For Wilmore, it may well have been for comedic effect, but even he would acknowledge that it wasn't all that funny—at least not in a conventional sense. Instead, this was a fiercely political moment.


http://www.vice.com/read/what-it-means-when-larry-wilmore-calls-president-obama-my-nigga

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why the hate for Larry at the WHCD??? [View all] northernsouthern May 2016 OP
He told some very uncomfortable truths and about the media Kalidurga May 2016 #1
Tapper was amused. northernsouthern May 2016 #7
He's not funny--he's not interesting... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #2
Have you watched it lately? northernsouthern May 2016 #8
Because virtually the entire audience knows they're living in a fantasy world. CincyDem May 2016 #3
I expected the media to have an issue... northernsouthern May 2016 #9
he was ok, had a few stinkers but dont they all. nice to hear him skew the media. but overall msongs May 2016 #4
who knows EdwardBernays May 2016 #5
"which is nothing close to the N-Word" -- Sorry, no sale Bucky May 2016 #6
Do you like shows with or without laugh tracks? northernsouthern May 2016 #11
The word Nigga is used both endearingly and disparagingly Bucky May 2016 #12
Are you saying it is used negatively by other people of color? northernsouthern May 2016 #15
Yes. That is what I say. Bucky May 2016 #16
I still think you have missed the point. northernsouthern May 2016 #17
baggage Bucky May 2016 #18
No, it was a very valid question... northernsouthern May 2016 #19
baggage Bucky May 2016 #20
So double negative? northernsouthern May 2016 #21
I thought he was great. polly7 May 2016 #10
That is exactly what I was thinking. northernsouthern May 2016 #13
Well said. polly7 May 2016 #14
He was very good. The audience was not. Nyan May 2016 #22
Forgot her said the predator line. northernsouthern May 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why the hate for Larry at...»Reply #15