Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

ReRe

(12,183 posts)

22. Thank you for that...

Reply to leveymg (Reply #15)

Tue May 10, 2016, 01:42 PM

May 2016

...small ray of hope for justice in this land. But we might have to wait until she's on the way out the door before Justice catches up? Well, that's no good. "Justice delayed is justice denied." ~~MLK,Jr

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mike Malloy - Will Hillary Clinton Be Cleared Or Indicted? [View all] hschulein May 2016 OP

I made a point of trashing primary forums to get away from this propoganda. RandySF May 2016 #1

Trash away. But there is no escaping the reckoning. leveymg May 2016 #3

That's a nice delusion RandySF May 2016 #4

It's the only outcome that maintains any semblance of lawful process leveymg May 2016 #5

Comey will not recommend any criminal charges because she broke no criminal laws. pnwmom May 2016 #9

The facts and the law and controlling EO indicate otherwise. leveymg May 2016 #14

I've answered you repeatedly in that OP and others. You are still wrong. pnwmom May 2016 #16

As I responded, he never discusses Sec. 793, just 798, a different statute. leveymg May 2016 #17

And where did you get your law degree? And how many years have you practiced? pnwmom May 2016 #18

When the facts and the law are against you, go all ad hominem. You have nothing else left. leveymg May 2016 #19

Right. You have no special expertise, you just are smarter than all the non-partisan lawyers pnwmom May 2016 #21

I have lined up the facts with the law. Why take anyone's word? You are free to examine them and leveymg May 2016 #23

Why should anyone bother to go law school? Why do we have lawyers and judges? pnwmom May 2016 #24

If you are looking to lawyers for truth and Judges for justice, you're likely to be disappointed. leveymg May 2016 #25

It's a totally valid discussion and needs to be had. Sweeping it under the rug is an injustice ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #12

does he pray every night for this to happen? hmmm nt msongs May 2016 #2

yes Skittles May 2016 #11

Thanks for posting Ned_Devine May 2016 #6

Poor Choice of Title Roy Rolling May 2016 #7

Clever! Justice Watch has peeled off their label now, to help us forget pnwmom May 2016 #8

Cleared of any criminal behavior. Still shows bad judgment but not malicious intent. n/t mikehiggins May 2016 #10

Will she be cleared or indicted? ReRe May 2016 #13

She's not going to be cleared. Indictment is still many steps away and may be delayed till pardon leveymg May 2016 #15

Thank you for that... ReRe May 2016 #22

This truthseeker understands! nt thereismore May 2016 #20

Of course no indictment. Innocence or guilt has nothing to do with the outcome. gordianot May 2016 #26