Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
49. Looking for another corporate network to take MSNBC's place?
Sun May 15, 2016, 03:31 PM
May 2016

This new one won't sell out.



Folks. Guess what? If you want a reliable network that doesn't corrupt its reporters or sell out to corporate interests, the only solution is a viewer/listener sponsored one. A truly listener/viewer sponsored one, not National rePublican Radio, for example, which continues to hoodwink listeners who remember its halcyon days. Those days have been gone for more than 20 years. Because NPR remains "smart," a lot of people mistakenly think it's still progressive, too. Trust me: It ain't.

As for MSNBC, assuming it ever took a truly "liberal" viewpoint (and I am inclined to doubt that), MSNBC did so not because it shared our progressive agenda or even because it valued the truth. It did so because it made its shareholders money and because it didn't threaten the powers-that-be. As soon as it no longer met those goals, bye bye liberal viewpoint.

What's the alternative? A true alternative? Listen/watch Democracy Now! specifically and Pacifica Radio in general. Another excellent option is TRNN, the Real News Network.

Follow the money and you won't be hurt when the next progressive network you pin your hopes on breaks your heart by going over to the dark side.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MSNBC is the corporatist network now. BillZBubb May 2016 #1
Yep. The unpurged hosts and anchors are noxious suckups for the Clinton Machine... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #30
Noxious is a good word. +1 Enthusiast May 2016 #38
There does seem to be a disturbing pattern to all this... hmmm InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #58
Didn't that happen in 2011? Beaverhausen May 2016 #2
And happened to Ed Schultz too Pharaoh May 2016 #3
Fast forward to when Ed was dropped, and after that... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #4
Actually, I can't zentrum May 2016 #7
I can't watch her anymore either arikara May 2016 #12
I don't even flick. No use for her. 840high May 2016 #14
WRONG. Rachel talks about everyone and everything. FLINT MICHIGAN don't you know !!!! trueblue2007 May 2016 #24
LOL! Duval May 2016 #26
Sorry, Duval. I no longer see this as a laughing matter. Enthusiast May 2016 #37
Yeah. We all heard her anti-Bernie narrative early in the primary. She was following a script Enthusiast May 2016 #36
I still check her out every now and then like I said arikara May 2016 #48
Oh please. She covers what the corporation allows her to. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #54
I will always be thankful for Rachel putting a big focus on my hometown, Flint Siwsan May 2016 #57
They seduce them with money. zeemike May 2016 #5
follow the money, follow the money, follow the money rurallib May 2016 #9
That is an extremely simple way to look at things SCantiGOP May 2016 #23
always a good starting point, though rurallib May 2016 #45
The answer to any question staring "why don't they -" SusanCalvin May 2016 #50
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #6
Buh bye. snort May 2016 #11
New in town, aint'cha? mac56 May 2016 #16
hope your pizza is cold. With anchovies. And you gag on it. lastlib May 2016 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #32
Yes, He Didn't Cave colsohlibgal May 2016 #8
What channels? nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #51
Hapened to Melissa Harris-Perry too Jemmons May 2016 #10
I'm a big fan SusanCalvin May 2016 #53
unfortunately true tiredtoo May 2016 #13
The switch away from liberal content happened so fast that most casual viewers are aware of it. Enthusiast May 2016 #39
They are the new fair and balanced. Noticed how many Republicans now go on the shows? Zen Democrat May 2016 #43
Yep. And they apparently think we're too stupid to notice. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #55
Both Ratigan and Schultz are gone.... glowing May 2016 #15
And Keith Olbermann!! Duval May 2016 #27
And Martin Bashir! Zen Democrat May 2016 #44
And Phil Donahue ybbor May 2016 #56
Well, why don't they all get together and form their own liberal network? nt Jitter65 May 2016 #17
Yes, that is why Bernie is calling for a Dem Fox JoeOtterbein May 2016 #18
If we had a Dem Fox I fear it would soon be undermined and controlled by party insiders Enthusiast May 2016 #40
Yup - they already have one waiting in the wings. Funding, programmings - all set! erronis May 2016 #52
FIVE years ago? Please.....and if you bother to look at your own source, you'd see that... George II May 2016 #19
K&R. I'd never heard this. Thanks for posting this bit of history. Overseas May 2016 #21
I would be nice to see Cenk tom_kelly May 2016 #22
Huge +1! Enthusiast May 2016 #35
Yeah but.... JeaneRaye May 2016 #25
She sure has, sold out. She knows we know, too. Enthusiast May 2016 #41
Now this is news, FIVE years ago news, as in 2011. Thinkingabout May 2016 #28
as stated in the OP Pharaoh May 2016 #29
Maybe if history is your main interest. Thinkingabout May 2016 #31
It's never wise to ignore history Pluvious May 2016 #46
lol, History = not important? Hydra May 2016 #47
Thanks. lovemydog May 2016 #33
Ana Kasparian is super appealing. Enthusiast May 2016 #42
When Cenk left MSNBC they were developing a corporate agenda. Now it is fully developed Enthusiast May 2016 #34
Looking for another corporate network to take MSNBC's place? RufusTFirefly May 2016 #49
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Cenk Leaves MSNBC (Inside...»Reply #49