First, I didn't imply that Cenk's positions were without merit, reason or logical thought. In fact, I never indicated that I disagreed with him. It was appalling that the AP and other news outlets called the primary election for Secretary Clinton before the final rounds of voting. I'm old enough to remember when the TV networks would begin making their projections when the first polls closed on the east coast but people all over the rest of the country were still voting. That's a horrible way to run elections and even today, with very modest restraints in place, the media constantly give us polls handicapping the "horse race." You've misinterpreted my comments but it's clear that you're as angry with our corrupted system as I am.
Second, I was giving my impression of his hyper-emotionalism that is an integral part of his onscreen personality. I've felt that over the past several months, Cenk has really ratcheted-up his delivery to a higher level and it seemed that he really wanted to influence the primary elections. Good for him because that's how a free press is supposed to work in a democracy. As a TYT subscriber, I know that his audience is diminutive compared to the broadcast and cable networks. Coupled with the prime demographic of TYT's audience, it was unlikely to make a big dent in the primaries. Still, it's all good for him and he hasn't lost me as a viewer. But I do hope his blood pressure comes down because his passions have slid into rage on occasion. There's another battle to fight and Democrats need Cenk fighting with us.
In closing, my original comment had nothing to do with any specific issues nor candidates. Your questioning me about Secretary Clinton's policy views seems like you'd like to debate something I haven't raised so I'll pass.
= new reply since forum marked as read