Video & Multimedia

Response to ish of the hammer (Reply #8)

Post removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

88 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders: Clinton can't lead a Political Revolution [View all] berniesandero Jun 2016 OP

I don't know EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #1

Sanders can't lead a relvoution either: he was rejected by many people lewebley3 Jun 2016 #29

No, people voted for the corporatism alternative. It's akin to Stockholm Syndrome. FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #39

I don't have Stockholm Syndrome. How many Banking Bills did Bernie submit, like EVER? nt LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #47

And that's why you support a person who's cleary in line with Wall Street and the bankers? Mmm.. ok FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #83

again...HOW many bills did Bernie introduce? Because talk is cheap LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #84

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #85

Nice try. No dice. It *is* the conversation..like exactly LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #86

No it isn't. Go back and reread the thread. FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #87

see post #47 nt LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #88

So was Hillary OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #60

This must be more of that unity stuff. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #2

or maybe more of that reality stuff virtualobserver Jun 2016 #3

God he has a clear mind and command of speaking swhisper1 Jun 2016 #10

He knows better. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #61

keep going Senator Sanders - we are united behind you! ish of the hammer Jun 2016 #8

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #30

Yes we are. 840high Jun 2016 #51

It's not that she can't - she *won't*. And it was never her intent to do so. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #4

Spot On. Phlem Jun 2016 #20

She is practical. apcalc Jun 2016 #34

She 'won't.' That is it in rwo words. pangaia Jun 2016 #78

Exactly right. nikto Jun 2016 #81

Bernie is keeping the pressure on, for the sake of Change/Reform Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #5

no, most of them folded under pressure. Bernie wont be blackmailed swhisper1 Jun 2016 #28

If he doesn't start helping: he will be a villain lewebley3 Jun 2016 #31

He is helping, that's the point Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #38

You mean selling out, chapdrum Jun 2016 #40

The Opposite Of Selling Out scottie55 Jun 2016 #50

Bobby Kennedy would have. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #62

You could be right Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #66

seems legit ! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #6

I don't want a revolution. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #7

they never work out if people dont try. What you call steady progress is not swhisper1 Jun 2016 #11

Just remember; Trump would be a 'revolution' too. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #15

Or Republicans, at least that's what we're told every election. Phlem Jun 2016 #21

he would certainly cause one, but you are citing civil war, which is not productive swhisper1 Jun 2016 #24

You are correct CrowCity: revolutions are bad ideas: hardwork is needed for Change lewebley3 Jun 2016 #32

POLITICAL Revolution means that the goals of said revolution would be acheived through legislation liberalnarb Jun 2016 #56

I'm just saying you can't control a revolution. You can't say nothing bad will happen. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #59

So basically you are not living in poverty, passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #57

Bernie can't even win the Dem Party nomination. Gamecock Lefty Jun 2016 #9

because his revolutionaries reach far beyond Dems. Even election fraud could not silence swhisper1 Jun 2016 #13

Your suspicions are certainly imaginative and quite florid, like hallicinations I imagine. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #53

nixon , both a pres and a loser. W also a pres and a loser swhisper1 Jun 2016 #58

Point of Fact: Hillary has not won the Dem nomination either Melissa G Jun 2016 #22

She was won: Sanders has lost: he lost fair and sqaure lewebley3 Jun 2016 #33

2,383 delegate votes needed to win Melissa G Jun 2016 #46

I am looking for someone who can lead the country liberal N proud Jun 2016 #12

you cannot lead a country that is owned by corporations swhisper1 Jun 2016 #14

Exactly. chapdrum Jun 2016 #42

Corporations, that Yuuuge generality, includes Bernie supporters, but no coprporation can be Prez. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #43

Can you be a little clearer? OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #63

I'm trying to get someone else to be a LOT clearer about their speech and thinking. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #71

Im a corp too. Not all corp buy polititians, dont be flippant. swhisper1 Jun 2016 #76

I have to argue with that All communications, pricesetting and votes in congress are dominently swhisper1 Jun 2016 #67

Now you are maligning the Democratic Party and our fine reps and senators. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #72

oh my god. bye-bye swhisper1 Jun 2016 #75

Indeed Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2016 #35

But it only takes a few thousand years to rebuild civilization, so let's all revolt now. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #73

Neither can you buddy. iandhr Jun 2016 #16

He has the majority of americans. the 99% are listening and jumping on board swhisper1 Jun 2016 #25

The "political revolution" is a fraud based on a premise that the voters rejected Renew Deal Jun 2016 #17

correction-half the dems rejected, not the 99% swhisper1 Jun 2016 #26

Your math doesn't add up Renew Deal Jun 2016 #27

She's not trying to lead a political revolution. Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #18

She IS the Status quo. Phlem Jun 2016 #19

Nope - no revolution. yallerdawg Jun 2016 #23

Most Dems don't want a revolution dcbuckeye Jun 2016 #36

He's still attacking the presumed nominee of our party? patsimp Jun 2016 #37

Not really... Saviolo Jun 2016 #48

if she were for change I would agree with you, but I do not see sincerety from her. swhisper1 Jun 2016 #68

Yes she can, but the job description isn't "lead a political revolution" now is it. Plus .... L. Coyote Jun 2016 #41

Was making Maggie Thatcher the PM a revolution in Britain? Jack Rabbit Jun 2016 #45

She doesn't WANT to lead a Political Revolution Night Watchman Jun 2016 #44

Storm is coming maindawg Jun 2016 #49

+1000 Phlem Jun 2016 #52

thank you dawg, I am part of that storm. I dont forget and I dont lay down swhisper1 Jun 2016 #69

Clinton doesn't claim to be a revolutionary. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #54

She is a corporate paraclete of the Trilateral Commission stripe OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #64

that's a classic, 3 more days! nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #65

Correlation between post count and Republican talking points is higher than the probability Bush L. Coyote Jun 2016 #74

I'm new here, checking out threads, stopping by to say hi. lapucelle Jun 2016 #55

wear your armour for the next 3 days lapucelle, but if you need to vent , go to the other site swhisper1 Jun 2016 #70

This is very boring. The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #77

Um..Well she's whooping your "revoluuution" mr sanders. misterhighwasted Jun 2016 #79

Revolution is of and by the people Buzz cook Jun 2016 #80

Just ask the DNC for the TRUTH... nikto Jun 2016 #82