Video & Multimedia

lapucelle

(21,115 posts)

55. I'm new here, checking out threads, stopping by to say hi.

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 03:16 PM

Jun 2016

My goodness, this is certainly a spirited debate.

There's nothing wrong with debate. We all have a lot to learn from each other.

To me the important thing is making sure Trump doesn't win the White House. Donald wants the trappings, the pomp, the salutes, and the fanfare. God only knows who'll be pulling the strings behind a Trump presidency. We have to be vigilant.

I hope we can all come together and stay strong through November.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

88 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders: Clinton can't lead a Political Revolution [View all] berniesandero Jun 2016 OP

I don't know EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #1

Sanders can't lead a relvoution either: he was rejected by many people lewebley3 Jun 2016 #29

No, people voted for the corporatism alternative. It's akin to Stockholm Syndrome. FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #39

I don't have Stockholm Syndrome. How many Banking Bills did Bernie submit, like EVER? nt LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #47

And that's why you support a person who's cleary in line with Wall Street and the bankers? Mmm.. ok FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #83

again...HOW many bills did Bernie introduce? Because talk is cheap LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #84

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #85

Nice try. No dice. It *is* the conversation..like exactly LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #86

No it isn't. Go back and reread the thread. FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #87

see post #47 nt LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #88

So was Hillary OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #60

This must be more of that unity stuff. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #2

or maybe more of that reality stuff virtualobserver Jun 2016 #3

God he has a clear mind and command of speaking swhisper1 Jun 2016 #10

He knows better. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #61

keep going Senator Sanders - we are united behind you! ish of the hammer Jun 2016 #8

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #30

Yes we are. 840high Jun 2016 #51

It's not that she can't - she *won't*. And it was never her intent to do so. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #4

Spot On. Phlem Jun 2016 #20

She is practical. apcalc Jun 2016 #34

She 'won't.' That is it in rwo words. pangaia Jun 2016 #78

Exactly right. nikto Jun 2016 #81

Bernie is keeping the pressure on, for the sake of Change/Reform Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #5

no, most of them folded under pressure. Bernie wont be blackmailed swhisper1 Jun 2016 #28

If he doesn't start helping: he will be a villain lewebley3 Jun 2016 #31

He is helping, that's the point Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #38

You mean selling out, chapdrum Jun 2016 #40

The Opposite Of Selling Out scottie55 Jun 2016 #50

Bobby Kennedy would have. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #62

You could be right Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #66

seems legit ! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #6

I don't want a revolution. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #7

they never work out if people dont try. What you call steady progress is not swhisper1 Jun 2016 #11

Just remember; Trump would be a 'revolution' too. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #15

Or Republicans, at least that's what we're told every election. Phlem Jun 2016 #21

he would certainly cause one, but you are citing civil war, which is not productive swhisper1 Jun 2016 #24

You are correct CrowCity: revolutions are bad ideas: hardwork is needed for Change lewebley3 Jun 2016 #32

POLITICAL Revolution means that the goals of said revolution would be acheived through legislation liberalnarb Jun 2016 #56

I'm just saying you can't control a revolution. You can't say nothing bad will happen. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #59

So basically you are not living in poverty, passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #57

Bernie can't even win the Dem Party nomination. Gamecock Lefty Jun 2016 #9

because his revolutionaries reach far beyond Dems. Even election fraud could not silence swhisper1 Jun 2016 #13

Your suspicions are certainly imaginative and quite florid, like hallicinations I imagine. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #53

nixon , both a pres and a loser. W also a pres and a loser swhisper1 Jun 2016 #58

Point of Fact: Hillary has not won the Dem nomination either Melissa G Jun 2016 #22

She was won: Sanders has lost: he lost fair and sqaure lewebley3 Jun 2016 #33

2,383 delegate votes needed to win Melissa G Jun 2016 #46

I am looking for someone who can lead the country liberal N proud Jun 2016 #12

you cannot lead a country that is owned by corporations swhisper1 Jun 2016 #14

Exactly. chapdrum Jun 2016 #42

Corporations, that Yuuuge generality, includes Bernie supporters, but no coprporation can be Prez. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #43

Can you be a little clearer? OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #63

I'm trying to get someone else to be a LOT clearer about their speech and thinking. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #71

Im a corp too. Not all corp buy polititians, dont be flippant. swhisper1 Jun 2016 #76

I have to argue with that All communications, pricesetting and votes in congress are dominently swhisper1 Jun 2016 #67

Now you are maligning the Democratic Party and our fine reps and senators. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #72

oh my god. bye-bye swhisper1 Jun 2016 #75

Indeed Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2016 #35

But it only takes a few thousand years to rebuild civilization, so let's all revolt now. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #73

Neither can you buddy. iandhr Jun 2016 #16

He has the majority of americans. the 99% are listening and jumping on board swhisper1 Jun 2016 #25

The "political revolution" is a fraud based on a premise that the voters rejected Renew Deal Jun 2016 #17

correction-half the dems rejected, not the 99% swhisper1 Jun 2016 #26

Your math doesn't add up Renew Deal Jun 2016 #27

She's not trying to lead a political revolution. Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #18

She IS the Status quo. Phlem Jun 2016 #19

Nope - no revolution. yallerdawg Jun 2016 #23

Most Dems don't want a revolution dcbuckeye Jun 2016 #36

He's still attacking the presumed nominee of our party? patsimp Jun 2016 #37

Not really... Saviolo Jun 2016 #48

if she were for change I would agree with you, but I do not see sincerety from her. swhisper1 Jun 2016 #68

Yes she can, but the job description isn't "lead a political revolution" now is it. Plus .... L. Coyote Jun 2016 #41

Was making Maggie Thatcher the PM a revolution in Britain? Jack Rabbit Jun 2016 #45

She doesn't WANT to lead a Political Revolution Night Watchman Jun 2016 #44

Storm is coming maindawg Jun 2016 #49

+1000 Phlem Jun 2016 #52

thank you dawg, I am part of that storm. I dont forget and I dont lay down swhisper1 Jun 2016 #69

Clinton doesn't claim to be a revolutionary. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #54

She is a corporate paraclete of the Trilateral Commission stripe OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #64

that's a classic, 3 more days! nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #65

Correlation between post count and Republican talking points is higher than the probability Bush L. Coyote Jun 2016 #74

I'm new here, checking out threads, stopping by to say hi. lapucelle Jun 2016 #55

wear your armour for the next 3 days lapucelle, but if you need to vent , go to the other site swhisper1 Jun 2016 #70

This is very boring. The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #77

Um..Well she's whooping your "revoluuution" mr sanders. misterhighwasted Jun 2016 #79

Revolution is of and by the people Buzz cook Jun 2016 #80

Just ask the DNC for the TRUTH... nikto Jun 2016 #82