Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,184 posts)
6. Trump racism reflects SCOTUS law over being able to BE racist as long as you don't TALK racist.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:47 AM
Jun 2016

That's at the heart of why Republicans don't use the language that would identify them as such.

The body of law that Michelle Alexander examines in The New Jim Crow proves that US courts have systematically built the legal precedents to enable the racism to go through institutional systems unchallenged. From state to SCOTUS, they have ruled that

NO data collection can prove racist intent
NO profile biases over time can prove racist intent
NO stop and frisk can prove racist intent

Only, in each case, if the authorized entity uses racial slurs and hate speech, can a case can be filed for the denial of another's civil rights. But even hate speech is protected, unless accompanied by the threat of force.

Not all Republicans are racist. Those who are not are often ganged up on and silenced by those who are.

Racism is a belief. It's not a crime. It's acting on racism that determines any denial of rights.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why Doesn’t Trump’s Racis...»Reply #6