Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
3. Thanks for posting this for those of us w/o tv. The third video was informative.
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 10:05 PM
Aug 2012

A lot of times when LEOs tell people or the media to not film, not do aerials, the public will assume the worst. This was clearly a rescue in process and although I'm not sure exactly how it could have caused harm to the officers or victims, with the ability to transfer that to portable devices could be a danger.

I had not thought of these details, but when they said this was a coordinated attack and there were several people, not just the old standby 'lone gunman' this seems to fit the terrorism definition. But why are they doing this now?

What is the purpose, unless they are playing out the old Nazi Party schemes of beginning race riots, etc. to overturn the government and install their dictatorship. I listened to them fulminate growing up. They wanted race riots to overturn the government and seize power.

And they reserved their biggest hatred for those hey called liberal 'race traitors.' It's the 1930s except its happening here, in bits and pieces, in slow motion.

We shouldn't be surprised after an entire generation grew up listening to Rush for almost 20 years and and Jones and Beck for 10 years. All thanks to the Koch's.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Shooting at Sikh temple i...»Reply #3