Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

republianmushroom

(22,378 posts)

12. Until the grand jury is presented evidence, from the DoJ,

Reply to Qutzupalotl (Reply #11)

Thu Dec 29, 2022, 01:29 PM

Dec 2022

there can be no indictment. The grand jury must have evidence from the DoJ before it can
determine whether or not there is enough evidence to indict for said crime. Correct.

With out evidence from the DoJ there can not be an indictment. The grand jury doesn't need to be
computerized it just needs the evidence, from the DoJ, to do their job. Maybe the
DoJ needs better computers ?

23 months and counting

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump White House EXPOSED BURNING DOCUMENTS in BOMBSHELL Deposition Testimony - Meidas Touch [View all] Rhiannon12866 Dec 2022 OP

nothing will happen to any of those involved. republianmushroom Dec 2022 #1

Are you psychic? Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #3

23 months and counting republianmushroom Dec 2022 #5

Kind of like Watergate, but bigger. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #6

"Worse Than Watergate" by quite a bit. Rhiannon12866 Dec 2022 #7

That's why I said bigger. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #8

You're right, a great deal bigger and infinitely more serious. Rhiannon12866 Dec 2022 #9

and they didn't have personal computers, cell phones . How did they do it republianmushroom Dec 2022 #10

They still haven't computerized a grand jury. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #11

Until the grand jury is presented evidence, from the DoJ, republianmushroom Dec 2022 #12

Consider that Garland never leaks. Smith won't either. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #13

On the other foot republianmushroom Dec 2022 #14

So the certainty in your initial post was unwarranted. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #15

no I'm speculating as you are. It is my OPTION. Sorry you don't like it republianmushroom Dec 2022 #16

You're talking out your ass. Sorry you don't like hearing it. Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #17

Don't mine that means your reading my posting. thank you republianmushroom Dec 2022 #18

At least it's not a thousand posts that say "I like it." Qutzupalotl Dec 2022 #19

friend of mine was chief petty officer , us navy. worked in nsa at dc. if she tried to get AllaN01Bear Dec 2022 #2

That should have happened to TFG. Would anyone have missed him? Rhiannon12866 Dec 2022 #4