Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Walleye

(44,909 posts)
5. Nader make some good points of course, and you are right it is not advantageous to carry a grudge
Tue Aug 15, 2023, 11:41 AM
Aug 2023

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ralph Nader is dead to me since 2000 Walleye Aug 2023 #1
I still cringe with anger when I hear his name. Another person i wish would jrthin Aug 2023 #2
I believe Al Gore had (has) the capability to be one of our greatest Presidents. Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #4
Nader make some good points of course, and you are right it is not advantageous to carry a grudge Walleye Aug 2023 #5
... Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #6
Same here. I don't give a damn what he says about anything. wnylib Aug 2023 #9
Things happen for a reason Jarqui Aug 2023 #3
Yeah musclecar6 Aug 2023 #11
Fuck Ralph Nader. Why does anyone with an ounce of self-respect care what he has to say? Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #7
I refer you to post#4 as to how I feel. Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #8
No thanks. Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #14
Nader is a tree, the corporate media was and still is to a lesser degree, the forest. Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #18
Nader is the topic, not "corporate media" or climate change ... why protect Nader? Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #19
The corporate media shaped the race more than other institution, why protect them? Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #27
Without Nader to steal votes, it wouldn't matter. Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #28
Stop talking about defending democracy and in the same breath claim someone that legally runs Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #29
You know perfectly well that Nader's "legal" candidacy benefited only ONE person: Bush. Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #31
This thread is about the threat against our democracy Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #32
No. Nader is to Democracy, what RFK-Jr is to Vaccines. Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #33
Your first and second posts #7 and #14 spell out that you're still fighting 2000 and Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #34
He's a divisive character. He needs to keep his FN mouth shut and retire into obscurity. Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #35
P.S. My mistake, you never talked about defending democracy on this thread. n/t Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #30
More Florida registered Dems voted for Bush than voted for Nader, thesquanderer Aug 2023 #37
Are we sure that Jack Smith of the DOJ filed all charges against tRUMP and his fellow conspirators? SWBTATTReg Aug 2023 #10
Nader did allude to that, Uncle Joe Aug 2023 #12
Ralph Nader needs to take responsibility, apologize, and then crawl back into his hole. lapucelle Aug 2023 #13
He's just as despicable and contemptible as Jill Stein, Nina Turner, Andrew Yang, et al* Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #15
The ego-driven hubris of Ralph Nader brought us the Iraq War, lapucelle Aug 2023 #16
Good question, "Why No Insurrection Charge?" republianmushroom Aug 2023 #17
Better to go for the easily-proven and "low-hanging-fruit" that juries can understand. Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #20
More than 80 charges, most felonies and no mug shot and he is not being coddled. B.S. republianmushroom Aug 2023 #21
Well, keep being angry. Enjoy! Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #22
No insurrection charges, no going after those in D.C. who helped with the insurrection. republianmushroom Aug 2023 #24
I'm fine with his priorities and approach. If your approach was a wise one or a viable one then-- Oopsie Daisy Aug 2023 #25
To each his own republianmushroom Aug 2023 #26
Trump riled up the crowd, but... zanana1 Aug 2023 #38
What is CRITICAL is to keep the Orange Degenerate OUT of the White House. PERIOD. MagaSmash Aug 2023 #23
Same here, any ship in a storm! Rhiannon12866 Aug 2023 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why No Insurrection Charg...»Reply #5