Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Why No Insurrection Charge? Ralph Nader on How Trump Could Still Be Reelected Unless DOJ Acts [View all]Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)31. You know perfectly well that Nader's "legal" candidacy benefited only ONE person: Bush.
He had ZERO chance of becoming President. He knew it. You know it. He was a spoiler. It was intentional. It was meant to harm the Democratic party and the Democratic candidate.
With regard to the other thing you accuse me of doing... that makes absolutely no sense. What TF are you talking about?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why No Insurrection Charge? Ralph Nader on How Trump Could Still Be Reelected Unless DOJ Acts [View all]
Uncle Joe
Aug 2023
OP
I believe Al Gore had (has) the capability to be one of our greatest Presidents.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2023
#4
Nader make some good points of course, and you are right it is not advantageous to carry a grudge
Walleye
Aug 2023
#5
Fuck Ralph Nader. Why does anyone with an ounce of self-respect care what he has to say?
Oopsie Daisy
Aug 2023
#7
Nader is a tree, the corporate media was and still is to a lesser degree, the forest.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2023
#18
Nader is the topic, not "corporate media" or climate change ... why protect Nader?
Oopsie Daisy
Aug 2023
#19
The corporate media shaped the race more than other institution, why protect them?
Uncle Joe
Aug 2023
#27
Stop talking about defending democracy and in the same breath claim someone that legally runs
Uncle Joe
Aug 2023
#29
You know perfectly well that Nader's "legal" candidacy benefited only ONE person: Bush.
Oopsie Daisy
Aug 2023
#31
Your first and second posts #7 and #14 spell out that you're still fighting 2000 and
Uncle Joe
Aug 2023
#34
He's a divisive character. He needs to keep his FN mouth shut and retire into obscurity.
Oopsie Daisy
Aug 2023
#35
P.S. My mistake, you never talked about defending democracy on this thread. n/t
Uncle Joe
Aug 2023
#30
Are we sure that Jack Smith of the DOJ filed all charges against tRUMP and his fellow conspirators?
SWBTATTReg
Aug 2023
#10
Ralph Nader needs to take responsibility, apologize, and then crawl back into his hole.
lapucelle
Aug 2023
#13
He's just as despicable and contemptible as Jill Stein, Nina Turner, Andrew Yang, et al*
Oopsie Daisy
Aug 2023
#15
Better to go for the easily-proven and "low-hanging-fruit" that juries can understand.
Oopsie Daisy
Aug 2023
#20
More than 80 charges, most felonies and no mug shot and he is not being coddled. B.S.
republianmushroom
Aug 2023
#21
No insurrection charges, no going after those in D.C. who helped with the insurrection.
republianmushroom
Aug 2023
#24
I'm fine with his priorities and approach. If your approach was a wise one or a viable one then--
Oopsie Daisy
Aug 2023
#25
What is CRITICAL is to keep the Orange Degenerate OUT of the White House. PERIOD.
MagaSmash
Aug 2023
#23